Search for: "United States v. Washington" Results 2821 - 2840 of 10,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2020, 2:40 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
EPA (Cultural Resources; Trust Relationship) United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am by Amy Howe
 In United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2022, 5:01 am by John Bellinger
Or should all of the detainees have been moved to detention facilities in the United States? [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
United States, in which the justices held 5-4 that the government ordinarily needs a warrant to access historical cell-site location information. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 4:10 am by jonathanturley
Support for this claim could be based on a  2019 study in the Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery that found that “Mass-shooting related homicides in the United States were reduced during the years of the federal assault weapons ban of 1994 to 2004”. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 10:01 am by Quinta Jurecic
That year, the Court handed down Hamdan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 5:54 am
  But to Washington State Trooper Brent Hanger, it was the smell of . . . arrest.Via Arbitrary & Capricious, and later the WSJ Law Blog (stealing Skelly's Cheech & Chong theme without any attribution at all), the Supreme Court of Washington did something that I haven't seen in quite a while in State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 9:30 am
United States District Judge Emmet G. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
At Crime and Consequences, Kent Scheidegger notes that the “theme out of the United States Supreme Court [yesterday was] materiality. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 11:52 am by Eugene Volokh
The protection order was based solely on Teel's actions in causing public records to be published—a right that is protected under both the United States and Washington Constitutions. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 8:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Jackson (Indian Reservation Diminishment)United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 4:29 am by Edith Roberts
Constitution Daily reports that “[o]ne of the most-significant cases of the Supreme Court’s current term,” United States v. [read post]