Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 2821 - 2840
of 6,888
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Sep 2022, 12:47 pm
Those state protections are effective against state court litigation, but they don’t protect people who are sued in federal court. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 2:43 am
I truly don't believe that's the case. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 1:16 pm
I don't have an opinion on the procedural argument, and it doesn't seem overly important to me whether Google is a legitimate amicus curiae in this case, given that there is no way Apple could prevent all the other members of that group of companies from filing an amicus brief. [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 2:12 am
That we don't call them criminals (at least in court decisions) doesn't make it light and fluffy. [read post]
26 Apr 2007, 2:38 pm
But Buss and other officials defend Indiana's procedures. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 3:42 am
I don't know whether that day will ever come. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 2:32 pm
” The court also cited an incident where the chairman of the Georgia House Reapportionment Committee told his colleagues, “The Justice Department is trying to make us draw nigger districts and I don't want to draw nigger districts. [read post]
28 Dec 2006, 10:02 am
That's why we held in Kurowski v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 5:54 am
I don't think Harris, Bexar, and Liberty will be the last counties we hear of in the next 3-5 years reducing jail populations to save costs. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 5:59 am
Why don't we just give em all 50 years in jail. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 5:48 am
Dec. 22, 2009), the First Department (don't ask, this gets confusing even to us), put a dozen or so squatter Lipitor plaintiffs back on a midnight train to Georgia - also on forum non conveniens grounds. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 8:30 am
But it's nice to know that, if anything ever happened to CAFA, playing "now you see it, now you don't" with identical class actions in different jurisdictions, isn't allowed under federal common law. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 1:04 pm
That doesn't necessarily mean that the broadcasters can’t prevail on the merits. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 1:56 pm
It's not that we don't embarrass easily, but that we don't embarrass. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 2:29 pm
And while we don't know the percentages, we know that in general they're close enough for the system to survive the mistakes. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 12:46 pm
“Ok, Sam, you don’t like the app. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 12:06 pm
It just seems to me that we shouldn't allow this. [read post]
5 Jul 2019, 9:23 pm
”), and doesn’t seem well-calibrated to persuade a federal district judge. [read post]
7 Jan 2010, 2:51 pm
[DCist] * Adventures in Lawyer Advertising: "Don't pee on me! [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 9:48 am
I don't get the sense that the plaintiff has invested significant dollars into the dispute or is willing to do so. [read post]
