Search for: "Weeks v. State of Me." Results 2821 - 2840 of 6,234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Oct 2012, 3:45 am by Russ Bensing
Maybe it’s just me, but if I were writing an opinion upholding the right of the state to execute someone, I don’t think I would have brought Jesus into it. [read post]
3 Mar 2025, 4:14 am by Peter A. Mahler
So when a Court of Appeals opinion in a dispute between LLC members comes along, LLC aficionados like me pay maximum attention — even if the dispute involves a Delaware LLC as occurred last month in Behler v Tao. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 3:13 am
Last week, in State v. [read post]
27 Mar 2013, 1:35 pm by Florian Mueller
At this point the document has to be redacted so as not to disclose confidential business information, and this process typically takes a few weeks. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 3:22 am
  First up is Benesch Friedlander v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:00 pm
This summer, we secured a favorable appeal in Simpkins v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:00 pm
This summer, we secured a favorable appeal in Simpkins v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 6:35 am by James Bickford
They swing around me. [read post]
24 Jan 2014, 6:23 am
The victim testified [at Bond’s trial] that, on the Friday of the week that the card had gone missing, [Bond] `looked at me and said, Jackie had nothing to do with it . . . [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 10:05 am by Elizabeth Wilson
For my initial post, I want to set down some thoughts about the decision last week by the European Court of Human Rights in the case of Othman (Abu Qatada) v. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 8:34 am by Duncan Hollis
United States) 1984 ICJ 169, 1986 ICJ 14 (4) Filartiga v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 4:16 pm by Charon QC
This week also brought ‘Fisting’ to the fore on twitter: Obscenity trial – the law is not suitable for a digital age Myles Jackman in the Guardian: “I welcome the jury’s verdict but the OPA means the state is still capable of acting as a voyeur in the bedroom” I need not trouble you with the facts of R v Peacock. [read post]