Search for: "AT&T Communications" Results 2841 - 2860 of 127,302
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 2:00 am by slemberg
It wasn’t until six weeks after McEndree filed his FDCPA lawsuit that Rash Curtis filed suit against McEndree in an attempt to collect the unpaid medical bill. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 9:45 am by Marsha Tesar
These folks cited a number of reasons why they didn't act on their estate plan. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 8:14 am by Steve Eder
The rules have always been pretty straightforward: jurors aren’t allowed to do their own research and they shouldn’t communicate about the case they are hearing. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 3:30 pm by Rich Shea
Contact The Shea Law Firm at (832) 426-3913.Related posts:Trial Court Overturned on Finding Husband Wasted Community PropertyWhy Your Personal Injury Award May Be Community PropertyHow to Keep Your Property from Becoming Community Property [read post]
28 Feb 2017, 2:13 am by Sander van Rijnswou
Rule 137(5) EPC is therefore not contravened.This is in line with the reasoning of the decisions of the Boards of Appeal T 507/11 (see Reasons 1.1 to 1.3), T 1285/11 (see Reason 2), T 1981/12 (see Reasons 4.1 to 4.5), and T 998/14 (see Reasons 1.1 to 1.3) dealing with similar circumstances. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 2:52 pm by Eric Schweibenz
James Gildea issued Order No. 4, denying a joint motion for addendum to the Ground Rules, and granting a joint motion for an addendum to the Protective Order in Certain Wireless Communication System Server Software, Wireless Handheld Devices And Battery Packs (Inv. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 6:18 pm by Jennifer Lynch
” Adding Stingrays to this mix means that these same communities are subject to more surveillance that chills speech and are less able to make 911 and other emergency calls than communities where the police aren’t regularly using Stingrays. [read post]
6 May 2011, 11:14 am
Two prominent Washington DC tech policy groups have asked the Federal Communications Commission to investigate Internet data caps in the US—with a special focus on AT&T. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
Board 3.3.08 had to deal with an A 53(b) objection:[2] The [opponent] has raised an objection under A 53(b) in its letter 24 September 2013 sent in reply to the Board’s communication pursuant Rule 15(1) RPBA. [read post]
11 Apr 2021, 11:38 am by Eleonora Rosati
The IPKat is pleased to host the following analysis by Vincenzo Vinciguerra (Weblegal and Cattolica University) on the recent design decision of the General Court in Lego, T-515/19.Here's what Vincenzo writes:The Lego Case T-515/19: A building block castle built up on sandby Vincenzo VinciguerraIn Lego A/S v EUIPO (T-515/19), the General Court (“GC”) considered the scope of protection of a design, consisting of the representation of a building-block that… [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 8:30 am by Jon Brodkin
Mobile voice is a common carrier service—similar to the utility status of the traditional wireline telephone network—placing it under the Federal Communications Commission’s jurisdiction. [read post]
28 Mar 2013, 6:01 pm by oliver randl
G 1/05 [11.1] and T 600/08 [2.3]. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 5:06 pm by John Steele
 Download QualcommnewUPDATE:  A combination of a failure to communicate, poor e-discovery procedures, and a client who wasn't candid with outside counsel. [read post]
We are calling on the FBI to stop using community outreach to gather intelligence and to be honest with community organizations about the information it gathers during outreach meetings. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
According to the jurisprudence of the boards of appeal the standard of disclosure for this requirement is that it must be possible to reproduce the invention on the basis of the original application documents without any inventive effort and undue burden, whereby the skilled person may use his common general knowledge to supplement the information contained in the application, textbooks and general technical literature forming part of the common general knowledge (see e.g. decisions T… [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Claim 1 is directed at a system, independent claim 9 to a method for playing the game, while further independent claim 17 defines the game unit for use in the claimed system. [2.2] The subject-matter of these claims undoubtedly has technical character following the generally accepted approach of T 931/95 and T 258/03. [read post]