Search for: "Banks v. State" Results 2841 - 2860 of 13,989
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 May 2014, 7:20 pm by Maureen Johnston
§ 1605(a)(2), the express definition of “agency” in the FSIA, the factors set forth in First National City Bank v. [read post]
12 Feb 2019, 4:29 am by Andrew Koppelman
How is a same-sex wedding like an Israeli West Bank settlement? [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  However, just four days after she allowed the plaintiffs’ claims to proceed with respect to those three offerings, the Second Circuit released its decision in Fait v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 1:13 am by Kevin LaCroix
  However, just four days after she allowed the plaintiffs’ claims to proceed with respect to those three offerings, the Second Circuit released its decision in Fait v. [read post]
8 Apr 2025, 9:48 pm by Saloni Khanderia
Factual Background Tyson entered into a reinsurance agreement with General Insurance Corporation of India (“GIC”), a state-owned-entity. [read post]
8 Nov 2024, 3:52 am by Byron O'Connor
The court referred, with approval, to the decision of Mosselbaai Boere Dienste (Pty) Ltd v OKB Motors CC 2024 JDR 1348 (FB), a full bench decision of the Free State Division, Bloemfontein. [read post]
28 May 2012, 1:50 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) O’Connell v Viridian Housing [2012] EWHC 1389 (QB) (25 May 2012) Lewis v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis & Ors [2012] EWHC 1391 (QB) (25 May 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) HM Revenue and Customs v The Football League Ltd & Anor [2012] EWHC 1372 (Ch) (25 May 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Shanmuganathan, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home… [read post]
4 Mar 2021, 5:01 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: When acting within its territorial boundaries and with respect to internal matters, an Indian Nation retains the sovereignty it enjoyed prior to the adoption of the United States Constitution except to the extent that its sovereignty has been abrogated or curtailed by Congress (see Montana v United States, 450 US 544, 564; United States v Kagama, 118 US 375, 381-382; Cayuga Nation v Campbell, 34 NY3d 282, 291, 293). [read post]