Search for: "Childs v. State" Results 2841 - 2860 of 21,040
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jun 2021, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
  Federal child support enforcement laws require states to collect Social Security numbers as part of applications for professional licenses if the state wishes to be eligible for certain federal grants. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 10:16 am by Cyberleagle
Both definitions make use of a legal fiction: the adult or child “of ordinary sensibilities”. [read post]
28 Jun 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 SC, CB and 8 children (Appellants) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions and others (Respondents), heard 20-22 October 2020 Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd,… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Kyle C. Velte
Supreme Court’s 1986 decision in Bowers v. [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
Last Week in the Courts On 23 June 2021 in the case of Abbasi v Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals [2021] EWHC 1699 (Fam) McFarlane P held there was jurisdiction to maintain or re-impose a reporting restriction order protecting the anonymity of clinicians and other treating staff involved in the care of a child, now deceased, who had been the subject of end of life proceedings under the inherent jurisdiction, where the order was to remain in force for a significant period following… [read post]
27 Jun 2021, 2:13 pm by Ralf Michaels
Similar to previous cases, such as Mennesson v France, Labassee v France, andParadiso and Campanelli v Italy, this complaint originated from the refusal of national authorities to recognise the parent-child relationship established in accordance with foreign law on the ground that surrogacy is prohibited under national law. [read post]
26 Jun 2021, 11:15 am by Russell Knight
” “[P]arents may create an enforceable agreement for modification of child support only by petitioning the court for support modification and then establishing, to the satisfaction of the court, that an agreement reached between the parents is in accord with the best interests of the children” Blisset v. [read post]
25 Jun 2021, 2:41 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
The Director for Public Prosecutions appealed successfully by way of case stated to the High Court. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 5:27 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
(Indian Child Welfare Act; Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act)Tribal Courts Bulletinhttps://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2021.html Mayes v. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:00 pm by Unknown
(Indian Child Welfare Act; Minnesota Indian Family Preservation Act) Tribal Courts Bulletin https://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/tribal/2021.html Mayes v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
That rule makes clear that a parent-child tie can be created by consent without any biological tie.Moreover, to the extent the marital presumption is a benefit of marriage, rather than a tight proxy for a genetic tie, it must be available to same-sex as well as different-sex couples in order to comply with the Supreme Court’s ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]