Search for: "Clinton v. Clinton"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 3,308
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Mar 2009, 2:10 pm
District Court in Boston under the name of Gill v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 12:34 pm
Times bombing trial, and the Clinton impeachment.I don't think I can justify taking the time away from work to go. [read post]
3 Mar 2009, 5:59 pm
DOMA, as I’ve posted about before, is a federal law enacted during the Clinton Administration that says that states do not have to recognize other’s state’s same-sex marriage. [read post]
1 Mar 2009, 9:09 pm
Following law school, Neil clerked for Judge Paul V. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 9:41 pm
Analysts say that these numbers are similar to those garnered by Clinton and Bush after each president’s first speech. [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 11:31 am
But the panel here hardly consists of right-wingers, and consists of Judges Willie Fletcher and Gould -- both Clinton appointees -- as well as Judge Noonan (who's a Reagan appointee, but who isn't uniformly conservative in immigration cases). [read post]
23 Feb 2009, 9:16 am
"State senators who remain supporters of the death penalty, starting with their way-too-long-time president, Thomas V. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 12:53 pm
One might think that a eclectic panel consisting of a Reagan, Clinton, and Bush II appointee might disagree a lot. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 8:48 am
Casitas Municipal Water v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 1:03 am
Roland Burris to the State's Attorney for a Possible Perjury Investigation02/17/2009
Letter to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton From House Foreign Affairs Ranking Member Ileana Ros-Lehtinen (PDF 232 KB)Letter Regarding Clinton's Trip to Asia02/17/2009
Letter to Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson and Federal Reserve Board of Governors Chairman Ben Bernanke From Nine House Members (PDF 184 KB)Letter Pertaining to Funds Received by American… [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 12:03 pm
United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 11:02 am
The former scourge of the Clinton Administration, Judicial Watch, is sued by its founder. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 5:57 am
This requirement is a revival of a Clinton administration order that was rescinded by President Bush. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 8:38 pm
Rodearmel, (Rodearmel v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 12:14 pm
New Jersey, et al.; E.P.A. v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 2:53 pm
" He briefly discusses Romer v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:02 pm
Clinton), and the press release:... [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:33 am
In Part II, I discuss the historical context of Don’t Ask Don’t, specifically focusing on the lessons of the Clinton era and President Clinton’s successful use of executive power to affect gay and lesbian service members. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 1:53 pm
Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit in the case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 1:02 pm
Pietrangelo v. [read post]
