Search for: "Companies A, B, and C" Results 2841 - 2860 of 12,895
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2018, 11:19 pm by Anthony Zaller
  Permitting B employees to pervade a company will result in only being able to hire C employees. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 5:21 am by Doug Cornelius
In the Glossary it’s defined as “An issuer that would be an investment company as defined in section 3 of the Investment Company Act of 1940 but for section 3(c)(1) or 3(c)(7) of that Act. [read post]
14 May 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
This appeal will consider the interpretation of the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 1(2)(b). [read post]
20 Mar 2017, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (A) (a Child) (by her litigation friend B) v Secretary of State for Health, heard 2 November 2016. [read post]
6 Mar 2008, 3:48 am
They warn not only of A, B, and C - the reactions Dr. [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 7:10 pm by Francis Pileggi
The court described the concept of transitive property in mathematics as providing that if A = B, and B = C, then A = C. [read post]
7 Jul 2016, 6:51 am by Steve Dickinson
There are many ways to do this, including by a) not charging the Chinese distributer for product that will be used as samples, b) giving the Chinese distributer reduced pricing for a certain number of products, and/or c) providing the Chinese distributer with cash incentive payments for advertising, for seminars and/or to partially or completely cover the cost of government registrations. [read post]
11 May 2019, 6:22 am by William S. Wilson
About two thirds of Medicare beneficiaries have Original Medicare, while about a third have Medicare Advantage (Part C) which is provided by private companies that are contracted by the government. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 11:26 am
The Platform B leak on the Penglai 19-3 oilfield began on 4 June, a the leak from Platform C on the same oilfield began on 17 June. [read post]
12 Dec 2008, 1:45 am
C) A dumb thing to let happen if you're Cisco because the name of the company will now be carried as a curse on the lips of the swarming and vocal masses of open source supporters on the web. [read post]
12 May 2011, 4:00 am
While I figure that out, you hit jump for more on why the National Labor Relations Board found no unfair labor practice when: (a) a unionized newspaper company, (b) with no social media policy, (c) which encouraged its employees to use Twitter, fired a reporter based on a few tweets. * * * [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 10:59 pm by JD Hull
Plus: (a) your firm is more efficient, (b) your overhead is likely lower, and (c) your work in any event is better. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 7:00 am by Karen Olson
So even though a doctor might recommend drug A to treat a patient's hypertension, an insurance company or government program would require the patient first try cheaper drugs B and C, and only after the cheaper drugs are shown to be ineffective can the patient receive the medicine his doctor recommended. [read post]
17 Feb 2013, 9:59 pm by JD Hull
Plus: (a) your firm is more efficient, (b) your overhead is likely lower, and (c) your work in any event is better. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 3:42 am by Mark Toth
  My company’s current employee handbook (1%) b. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 11:30 am
In his 29-page decision dated May 19, 2008, Commercial Division Justice Ira B. [read post]
28 Sep 2013, 6:24 pm by Ron Coleman
, then count to three and go right back into competition with the company — using his own name. [read post]
5 May 2014, 7:08 am by David J. Clark
As noted in the press release accompanying the bill, the so-called “Defend Trade Secrets Act would empower companies to protect their trade secrets in federal court. [read post]