Search for: "Companies A, B, and C"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 12,895
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2020, 5:21 pm
The Federal Court found that Exaltexx satisfied the tripartite test for an interlocutory injunction with respect to communications with the Third Party Companies and other suppliers: (a) there was a serious issue to be tried, (b) Exaltexx would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction was not granted, and (c) the balance of convenience favoured granting the injunction. [read post]
11 May 2020, 5:21 pm
The Federal Court found that Exaltexx satisfied the tripartite test for an interlocutory injunction with respect to communications with the Third Party Companies and other suppliers: (a) there was a serious issue to be tried, (b) Exaltexx would suffer irreparable harm if the injunction was not granted, and (c) the balance of convenience favoured granting the injunction. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
These include selecting the panel members (roughly equal to a civilian jury), from within the chain of command (all of whom would be junior in rank to this convening authority), as well as an authority to dismiss or withdrawal charges (Rules for Courts-Martial [R.C.M.] 401(c)(1) and 604(a)) before or during trial, to approve or reject offers to plead guilty (R.C.M. 705), and to approve expert witnesses requested by the defense and fund witness travel (R.C.M. 703). [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:20 am
§2113(c). [read post]
10 May 2020, 7:25 pm
C. [read post]
9 May 2020, 9:38 am
As has been noted earlier, the definitional provision in the Arbitration Act, 1940 [Section 2(b)], merely defines an “award” to “mean an arbitral award”. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:21 pm
” 735 ILCS 5/2-209(c). [read post]
8 May 2020, 11:19 am
“Adjacent wetlands” is defined to mean any wetland that is connected to a jurisdictional water by (a) physically abutting the jurisdictional water, (b) inundation by flooding in a typical year from a jurisdictional water, or (c) physical separation from a jurisdictional water by a natural or artificial barrier. [read post]
8 May 2020, 5:58 am
Niles, and Justin C. [read post]
7 May 2020, 11:00 pm
If human rights and environmental damages claims are simultaneously directed against a domestic enterprise, for example a mother company or a buyer company in the EU, at least partially, foreign subsidiaries and suppliers can be sued on the basis of special jurisdiction over multiple defendants which can be used strategically. a) If foreign enterprises have their seat in a third State outside the European Union, the jurisdiction of the domestic courts over the foreign co-defendant… [read post]
7 May 2020, 9:53 am
That test requires an employer to prove the following to justify “independent contractor” classification: A. the worker is free from the control and direction of the hiring entity in the performance of the work, both under the contract for the performance of the work and in fact; B. the worker performs work that is outside the usual course of the hiring entity’s business; and C. [read post]
6 May 2020, 1:21 pm
Not unlike the class actions already pending against the ride share companies in California, the Attorney General’s suit alleges that the companies do not satisfy the “B” prong of the “ABC” test because the drivers are engaged in work that is within the usual course of the companies’ businesses. [read post]
6 May 2020, 9:12 am
Id. c. [read post]
5 May 2020, 9:46 pm
In the calculation illustrated above, that would mean that if your “B” value is larger than anyone else’s B, then you will dominate that month’s allocation. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:05 pm
” C. [read post]
5 May 2020, 12:05 pm
” C. [read post]
5 May 2020, 10:21 am
Section 12.0 explains that the List B “ID card issued by federal, state or local government agencies or entities, provided it contains a photograph or information such as name, date of birth, gender, height, eye color and address” is not the same as a List B driver’s license. [read post]
5 May 2020, 5:00 am
The unfortunate result of this guidance is that it has prompted SDOs to take one of three approaches to Huawei: (a) exile Huawei from their organizations; (b) make all calls and meetings between participating members public so that there is no question about whether an SDO’s internal processes result in “published” standards under the BIS’s regulations; or (c) allow Huawei to remain a member but prohibit U.S. companies from participating in any… [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:03 pm
The coronavirus has spread to all 50 states, the District of Columbia and multiple territories, with case totals still increasing rapidly in the United States. [read post]
3 May 2020, 7:19 am
Hamilton breached the non-solicitation when he invited Company employees to “like” Thrive’s Facebook page likewise lacks merit. [read post]
