Search for: "Cost v. Cost"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 48,948
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2007, 5:23 am
Revenue and Customs Commissioners v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 8:01 am
; Churchland v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 9:03 am
[Thomas Stebbins, Poughkeepsie Journal; Daily News] Tags: joint and several liability, New York, taxpayers, third party liability for crime Related posts Update: San Diego poisoning (1) Trespassers and skylights, UK edition (1) Rolando Montez’s fatal phone call: JCW Electronics, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:41 pm
In Porter Development, LLC v. [read post]
23 Sep 2010, 2:51 pm
In Holden v. [read post]
25 Sep 2017, 7:41 pm
The Eleventh Circuit ruled earlier this week in Morrissey v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 2:17 am
High Court (Chancery Division)Phoenix Property Investors Ltd v Grange Securities Ltd [2011] EWHC 1131 (Ch) (05 May 2011)Kingspan Group Plc & Anor v Rockwool Ltd (on costs) [2011] EWHC 1065 (Ch) (14 April 2011) High Court (Family Division)L (A Child: Media Reporting), Re [2011] EWHC B8 (Fam) (18 April 2011) High Court (Commercial Court)DSG International Sourcing Ltd & Anor v Universal Media Corporation (Slovakia) SRO [2011] EWHC 1116 (Comm) (05 May 2011)… [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 8:00 am
In Chavarria v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 2:09 pm
In Graves v. [read post]
7 Feb 2011, 3:00 am
Solicitors Regulation Authority v Davis and another [2011] WLR (D) 36 “Where a solicitor admitted disciplinary charges, and therefore anticipated sanctions upon him, he should give notice in advance of the hearing to the Solicitors Regulation Authority and the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal that he intended to contend either that no order for costs should be made against him, in exercise of the tribunal’s power under section 47(2) of the Solicitors Act 1974, or that… [read post]
11 Nov 2015, 9:44 am
It argued unsuccessfully for a broad remedy in both Mertens v. [read post]
6 Feb 2007, 3:44 am
United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 1:14 pm
Posner (University of Chicago - Law School) has posted ProCD v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 9:52 pm
So, a qualified extremely heavily regulated, insured solicitor who agrees to indemnify his or her client against an adverse costs order breaks the rule; In Dix v Townend [2008] APP.L.R 06/30, Deputy Master Victoria Williams, Costs Judge, controversially ruled that solicitors who agreed to indemnify their client against the other side’s costs are acting unlawfully by reason of champerty and thus are entitled to no costs at all. [read post]
11 Oct 2013, 7:54 am
In the recent case (Sidhu v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:39 am
Family Law Week has published two judgments in the case of N v N, which went before the Court of Appeal at the end of June. [read post]
23 Aug 2021, 9:00 am
Response Tr. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:30 am
In Lains v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:00 pm
In Pero v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 4:30 am
Axis Surplus Insurance Company v. [read post]
