Search for: "Does 1 through 10," Results 2841 - 2860 of 21,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jan 2016, 8:29 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Divorce Lawyer said the Supreme Court, Westchester County, directed a joint trial of the actions in Westchester County, and granted the wife leave to enter a money judgment in the sum of $21,150, representing the arrears in maintenance from February 1, 1987, through November 30, 1988. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 1:17 am by Rose Hughes
The granted claims specified 4-aminopyridine for use in a method of increasing walking speed of a patient with MS, wherein the 4-aminopyridine was administered as a 10 mg twice daily dose (Bid).Sufficiency "over the whole scope of the claim" does not require the exclusion of non-respondersNot all patients suffering from a complex disease will respond to treatment. [read post]
17 May 2010, 5:09 am by Broc Romanek
Compare the SEC's Rule 262(a)(3), imposing a 5-year look-back, and Rule 262(b)(1), imposing a 10-year look-back, on the convictions specified in those provisions [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 11:53 am by Jon Sham
 Court of Appeals: MVA can use expunged records – by Steve Lash An expungement of the public record of drunken-driving convictions after 10 years does not prevent the Maryland Motor Vehicle Administration from retaining a “confidential” record of those convictions for licensing purposes, Maryland’s top court said Monday. [read post]
13 Oct 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
Other persons who have acquired knowledge of the author or the source through their work for the publishers, editors, press agency or printers in question have the same right as the editor. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:31 am by Jelle Hoekstra
In this decision the Board of Appeal is annoyed about the fact that a Rule 140 Correction of a decision of the Examining Division (signed by the whole division) and a Rule 139 Correction of an obvious error (signed only by the primary examiner in the opposition period, i.e. after grant; G 1/10 stopping this process was not yet issued) are not in the public part of the file.The Board sees the R.139 correction as not valid since no formally correct decision is taken; it would require… [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 8:49 pm
Standard stuff, I know, but I thought I should get that out there. 10.) [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 9:10 am
., decided 10/16/2008) An employee of one of Tishman's subcontractors, Manhattan Concrete Structures, was injured while working at a construction site. [read post]
1 May 2008, 3:10 pm
Of the 10 subprime cases, seven pertained to auction rate securities. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
 [8] The appellant-opponent has argued that claim 1 does not fulfil one prerequisite to qualify as a second medical use-claim in accordance with G 5/83, namely that a “medicament” is used in the treatment. [read post]