Search for: "Ex Parte Clear"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 5,122
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2014, 5:30 am
There is nothing clear about it. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 11:43 am
The Government has now had three opportunities to claims justified exceptions to the Vaughn index disclosures—first, in its brief on the merits, second, in the pending petition for rehearing, and third, in its response to the Court's ex parte letter of June 10, submitting for in camera review the Court's proposed Revised Opinion. [read post]
11 Jul 2014, 6:48 am
It’s important to keep clear boundaries so that your children wouldn’t harbor fantasies that you will reconcile. [read post]
10 Jul 2014, 4:00 am
Is it possibly ineffective lawyering not to advise a client to attempt to access shared computers in the hopes of obtaining favorable or incriminating evidence against a soon to be ex-spouse? [read post]
9 Jul 2014, 1:15 pm
Part I, regarding the 2014 OVDP: I. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:47 pm
This is a clear and unmistakable disavowal of claim scope.Id. at *8.Disavowal on Parent Patent Trickles Down to Child PatentsX2Y’s argument that some of the disclaimers are inapplicable because they appear only in priority patents to which the asserted patents are only related as continuations-in-part is without merit on the facts of this case. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 12:14 pm
Given that, I think the issue has to be litigated ex post, not ex ante. [read post]
7 Jul 2014, 8:33 am
And the law is clear that the State cannot unilaterally decide questions of fact. [read post]
2 Jul 2014, 7:20 am
Insofar as certain dicta in Ex Parte Quirin, 317 U.S. 1 (1942) has sometimes been read to suggest otherwise, the OLC Memo points out that the Supreme Court’s actual holding “focused on [the defendants’] conduct behind enemy lines. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 3:09 pm
R v Brent London Borough council ex parte Sadiq (2001) 33 H.L.R 47 held that a council could not reverse its own earlier s.184 decision. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:31 am
On June 25, 2014, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in the case of State of Ohio ex. rel. [read post]
28 Jun 2014, 12:13 pm
(See the discussion in Part II.) [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 12:31 pm
Warrants are issued in ex parte proceedings—the intended subject of the warrant is not present, for obvious reasons, only the law enforcement officer seeking the warrant is—and so are usually granted even when the officer’s showing of probable cause is quite thin. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 8:47 am
The Supreme Court made this clear in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:08 am
Transformative Use The second part of the first fair use factor asks whether the defendant’s use of copyrighted material was “transformative. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:53 pm
Department of Transportation ex rel Arnold v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:16 pm
In 1976 Congress amended the Copyright Act in large part to reject the Court’s holdings in Fortnightly and Teleprompter. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 4:00 am
Given the hostility of the majority inHamdan to the remaining sliver of Presidential authority to convene military commissions not authorized by Congress, recognized by Ex Parte Quirin, 317 U. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 2:56 pm
But when a High Court Judge orders that a ‘clear and repeated contempt of court should attract proper sanction in the form of publicity’, who are we to refuse to assist? [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:29 am
" (Ex parte Bleibler, PTAB 2012.) [read post]
