Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 27,756
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jun 2010, 9:53 am
Matter of Jessica Coulter v State of NY Insurance Department Petitioner brought about this Article 78 case to review a determination of the State of New York Insurance Department adopting the recommendation of a hearing officer and revoking petitioner’s insurance broker license in New York. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 4:02 am
Moore v. [read post]
19 Sep 2024, 12:48 pm
This procedure is addressed in Department of Fair Employment and Housing v. [read post]
1 Apr 2023, 8:05 am
Longarzo * DMCA’s Unhelpful 512(f) Preempts Helpful State Law Claims–Stevens v. [read post]
18 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 7:34 am
RUEDA, Appellant V. [read post]
14 Aug 2006, 6:44 am
Eufaula Drugs, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 5:29 pm
IntroductionThe recent decision in Baker v. [read post]
New Judgment: R (Steinfeld & Anor) v Secretary of State for International Development [2018] UKSC 32
27 Jun 2018, 2:13 am
Even if it were, a fair balance between the appellants’ rights and the interests of the community has not been struck because the interests of the community in denying civil partnerships to different-sex couples who do not wish to marry are unspecified, whereas the consequences of this denial for such couples may be far-reaching. [read post]
18 Sep 2014, 9:01 pm
Similarly in Pollen v. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 7:03 am
Section 16(b) of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) permitted collective actions when it was passed in 1938. [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:48 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2017, 6:44 pm
Abbott Cinema West, LLC v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:28 am
") AC30082 - State v. [read post]
14 Apr 2012, 8:07 am
On April 12, 2012, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals decided Price v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:11 am
State of Maryland v. [read post]
18 Jul 2024, 8:37 am
In 1995, in Celotex v. [read post]
4 Sep 2019, 10:13 am
United States, No. 18-1851 C (Ct. [read post]
23 Nov 2017, 3:44 am
Perhaps surprisingly, the Court unequivocally departs from its decision in R (Kaiyam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2014] UKSC 66 (decided less than three years earlier) to endorse the narrower understanding of the obligation set down by the ECtHR in James v UK (App no. 25119/09). [read post]
25 Apr 2011, 7:37 pm
The Supreme Court will soon hear oral arguments in Sorrell v. [read post]