Search for: "I v. B" Results 2841 - 2860 of 24,528
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Mar 2009, 5:17 pm
It's late and I'm very tired tonight, so I'll grab Judge Erdmann's helpful synopsis of his opinion of the court in United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2006, 6:58 am
Flores No. 93,973 Ford CountyMorgan B. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 8:48 am by MBettman
Supreme Court Decision Part I is the Case Background Part II A  In this part of the opinion, the Court reviews the basic Confrontation Clause jurisprudence from Crawford v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 1:44 pm by Lisa A. Mazzie
One man put her 35-page dissent in Burwell v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 2:21 pm
 Absent a clearer statutory mandate than §36(b), or more evidence of market failure than was presented in Jones v. [read post]
21 May 2007, 9:08 am
It should be noted that a finding of neglect need only be proved by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Court Act § 1046[b][i]). [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:27 am by Daniel Sokol
W (by her litigation friend, B) v M (by her litigation friend, the Official Solicitor) and others [2011] EWHC 2443 (Fam). [read post]
8 Jan 2020, 4:28 am
But since 10th May 2018 Ed’s royalties for the song have been frozen after singer-songwriter Sam Chokri (known as Sami Switch) claimed that 'Shape of you' was copied from Sam’s song 'Oh why'.Sheeran and fellow felineAs a result, Sheeran, together with Steven Muccutcheon (songwriter, second claimant), John Mcdaid (songwriter, the one from Snow Patrol, third claimant), Sony Music, Rokstone Music, Spirit B, Kobalt Music (publishing companies, assignees and… [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]