Search for: "In Re: Mark M."
Results 2841 - 2860
of 7,664
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Because if you’re not, it gets better! [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 3:08 pm
Still, given how this opinion could have turned out, I still give this opinion very high marks. [read post]
13 Nov 2015, 11:13 am
So I’m doing great. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 4:27 pm
The three judges dissenting with the majority’s approach, Mark Villiger, Boštjan M. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 2:00 pm
I’m lucky enough to have experienced what might have been the sweet spot of airline travel. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:24 am
You're not the boss of me. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 6:13 am
”) At Oral Argument Arguing Counsel Charles M. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:00 am
Turns out, as I’ve always believed, they’re not dull at all. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 3:43 am
Narrative, imperative, ending single trigger Every year the CD&A grows bigger and bigger Board’s unhappy, better use best practice Independent comp committee gonna watch our … I’m a take Mark Borges’ style, I’m a take Mark Borges’ style, No for real, ask him, can he read my proxy? [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 11:44 am
Today, we’re recruiting. [read post]
2 Nov 2015, 3:09 am
I’m feeling a bit culture stalked. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 6:10 am
Brands, and their trade marks, are some of the most valuable IP out there and flourish in the current environment. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 5:00 am
Even if I had it for five years or whatever, it was the best ever and I’m grateful I did. [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 1:07 pm
A brief review of the justifications usually given for the exclusions for marks that are scandalous or disparaging: (1) the harm done by the government endorsement represented by a registration; (2) the desire to withhold government resources from disparaging or scandalous terms; (3) the lack of any effect on a user’s ability or right to use the mark, with (a) possible §43(a) or state common law protection against confusing uses despite unregistrability, though… [read post]
23 Oct 2015, 12:37 pm
Washington team’s marks—long time registered, compared to In re Tam where the examiner denied registrations. [read post]
21 Oct 2015, 10:09 am
A metric that helps us understand the impact we're having on the business throughput can be pretty powerful. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 11:39 pm
I’m thinking, most Examining Attorneys would have checked that one at the baggage claim. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 11:28 am
[I am now being instructed to delete that with 9 exclamation marks].!!!!!!!!! [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 6:58 am
And if you’re going to burn some people to save others, you ought to give them a chance to make their case as well. [read post]
18 Oct 2015, 5:29 am
The author of the Times’ op-ed, Mark St. [read post]
