Search for: "John Doe C" Results 2841 - 2860 of 5,522
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jan 2015, 10:47 am by Barry Sookman
Denturist Association of Canada, 2014 FC 989, the Federal Court ruled that copyright does not subsist in the five-digit numerical codes and corresponding description of denturist services contained within the DAC Procedures Codes and DAC Fee Guides. [read post]
28 Dec 2014, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
Bull (George Mason University) & Adam C. [read post]
27 Dec 2014, 2:19 am by Ben
The CJEU in Svensson (C-466/12) ruled that a clickable hyperlink (as well as a framing link) to an authorised and publicly available work does not infringe the communication to the public right, because the public is not new. [read post]
24 Dec 2014, 7:24 am
When I started it back in Ought 6, my goal was to offer fellow bloggers an opportunity to share their thoughts on risk:"The purpose of the C of R is to offer insights into the world of risk management; generally, this will be insurance-related, but that’s not a requirement. [read post]
22 Dec 2014, 11:40 am by John Jascob
The chancery court also ordered C&J to shop itself in the face of merger terms that barred C&J from taking more bids.According to two late November orders, Vice Chancellor John W. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 12:34 am by Editors
Time to check your crystal ball to see what it portends for the legal industry in 2015 – or you can just head over to the Business of Law Blog to see what others think. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
As my colleague John Dean concluded in his most recent column here on Verdict, we should “expect little other than talk. [read post]
17 Dec 2014, 6:00 am by Jennifer Williams
And how can the United States prevent this from happening in a way that does not make things worse? [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Thomas Davis, Ogletree Deakins, Hirsch/Workplace Prof, earlier] “Expanding Joint Employer Status: What Does it Mean for Workers and Job Creators? [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
§875(c); and (2) Regardless of what the statute provides, does the First Amendment right of free speech require that only a person intending to cause fear with his threatening utterances be subject to criminal penalties? [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:29 pm by John Palley
It may also designate as a person authorized to act with regard to its nationals its diplomatic or consular agents abroad insofar as the local law does not prohibit it. 2. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 6:29 pm by John Palley
It may also designate as a person authorized to act with regard to its nationals its diplomatic or consular agents abroad insofar as the local law does not prohibit it. 2. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 3:50 pm by John Palley
It may also designate as a person authorized to act with regard to its nationals its diplomatic or consular agents abroad insofar as the local law does not prohibit it. 2. [read post]