Search for: "John Doe D" Results 2841 - 2860 of 9,814
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jun 2018, 4:17 am by Edith Roberts
Virginia, in which the justices held on Tuesday that the automobile exception to the warrant requirement does not permit a warrantless search of a vehicle parked in the driveway of a home. [read post]
31 May 2018, 5:12 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
“The Court’s ruling was based on a narrow and limited reading of the proclamation, without any consideration of the full scope of the subject matter the governor’s proclamation opened up to the legislature,” said John C. [read post]
29 May 2018, 4:38 pm
D=CFPB_FRDOC_0001-0603 (link is external)Re: Consumer complaints, Docket ID: CFPB-2018-0006Dear Ms. [read post]
26 May 2018, 7:19 am by Rachel Bercovitz
Quinta Jurecic posted the draft legislation introduced by Senator Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) to repeal and replace the 2001 AUMF. [read post]
25 May 2018, 1:30 pm
While Mortensen has little empathy for immigrants, he does believe there is one victim of today’s politics: Donald Trump. [read post]
25 May 2018, 11:30 am by John K. Ross
But a separate provision requiring health warning labels on cigar boxes and advertisements does not violate the First Amendment. [read post]
25 May 2018, 6:41 am by John Elwood
John Elwood (finally) reviews Monday’s relists. [read post]
23 May 2018, 11:01 am by Ilya Somin
Committed small-d democrats would do well to adopt some version of living constitutionalism. [read post]
23 May 2018, 9:58 am by John Buhl
John Hickenlooper (D) noted, Colorado could reduce black market activity – and bolster its tax base – by “mak[ing] sure there is not as large a price differential. [read post]
22 May 2018, 4:27 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
”   “This legal struggle reinforces my faith in God because I know in my heart that he does not want his children to suffer needlessly at life’s inevitable end,” said Rev. [read post]
21 May 2018, 5:44 am
"Section 2(d) “does not speak of ‘continuous use,’ but rather of whether the mark or trade name has been ‘previously used in the United States by another and not abandoned. [read post]