Search for: "LAWS v. DAVIS"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 6,273
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2015, 3:49 pm
We have previously noted that when a statute imposes criminal liability for knowingly disregarding a risk, it does not require a particular outcome or actions aimed at a specific individual; the crime is solely defined by the risk of injury produced by defendant's conduct (see, People v Davis, 72 NY2d 32, 36-37). [read post]
21 May 2015, 3:45 pm
Davis (Jurisdiction; Defamation) State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2015state.htmlSeminole Tribe of Florida v. [read post]
21 May 2015, 10:39 am
He concluded "The primary task of the specification is to explain the invention so that the claims are supported and can be understood and so that the skilled person can perform the invention to the standard required by the law. [read post]
19 May 2015, 5:12 pm
Davis, 232 AD2d 773 [3d Dept 1996]; Mohammed v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 4:49 am
Quintanilla v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 6:30 am
He shows up in Forging Rivals as the lead attorney in James v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
9 May 2015, 6:25 am
Davis. [read post]
8 May 2015, 9:18 am
” We were briefly excited when Davis v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:01 pm
But in 1997, in City of Boerne v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 3:40 pm
Although law enforcement claimed it only wanted the location information to pin Davis to the seven robberies, armed with the SCA order, police obtained more than two months worth of location information on Davis, which gave them a whopping 11,000 cell phone tower data points. [read post]
7 May 2015, 9:13 am
Schwinn, John Marshall Law School The en banc Eleventh Circuit ruled this week in United States v. [read post]
7 May 2015, 6:53 am
United States v. [read post]
6 May 2015, 11:27 am
The decision by the 11th Circuit (which Wells linked to here) reversed the Court’s previous decision that the government had illegally snooped on Quartavious Davis by obtaining Davis’s past cell phone locations without a warrant. [read post]
6 May 2015, 5:03 am
United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:27 pm
” Coolidge v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:01 pm
Counsel’s response at oral argument is faithful to Davis’s broader claim, but misapprehends the governing law. [read post]
4 May 2015, 1:36 pm
Robert Corn-Revere is a partner at Davis Wright Tremaine LLP, where he practices First Amendment law. [read post]
