Search for: "Land v. United States"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 6,678
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2016, 1:43 pm
Even under the appropriately exacting standards of New York Times v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
State v. [read post]
16 Dec 2016, 4:00 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2016, 4:05 am
The complaint (full text) in United States v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 11:14 am
., LLC v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 12:01 am
2, of the United States Constitution and failing to comply with 3 U.S.C. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
Schaefer v. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:03 am
There were clearly no Fourth Amendment concerns in the initial collection, as this was classic FAA 702 targeting of a non-U.S. person outside the United States, and there are no allegations of improper targeting, retention, dissemination, or other use of the target’s communications. [read post]
9 Dec 2016, 11:00 am
Toomey argued that the district court had misunderstood several important technical aspects of Upstream surveillance and, as a result, had underestimated the scope and scale of the United States government’s searches of private internet communications. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 3:35 pm
Related Cases: United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
United States, 16-142. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
He says that it is for the UK Parliament to change the law of the land, but that the devolved legislatures are entitled to have a voice in that decision also. 15.38 The Lord Advocate replies that the legislative consent convention is no longer merely a convention, but is now converted into a rule of law because it has been enacted into statute by the Scotland Act 2016. 15.36 Lord Mance is asking the Lord Advocate whether the legislative consent convention is properly a… [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 11:28 am
., filed suit in the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana to challenge BSEE’s interpretation. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am
Justice Black’s opinion in Afroyim v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 12:01 am
“ Thurgood Marshall in 1957 On September 15, 1959, Boynton filed a petition for certiorari in the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
3 Dec 2016, 8:49 pm
Army Corps of Engineers should not grant an easement across federal lands; the United States failed to adequately consult and to prepare an adequate assessment of environmental and social impacts of the pipeline, required under both U.S. and international law; and the United States has failed to protect peaceful protestors. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 9:39 pm
Cook v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 8:02 am
That follows from the originalist view that the Constitution’s text means today what the people of the United States understood it to mean when it was ratified. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 7:23 am
Such legislation would almost certainly pass constitutional muster: Under South Dakota v. [read post]
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm
His passing meant that I had to find a different way to address Citizens United in the book. [read post]
