Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 4,051
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Aug 2011, 1:05 pm
From the Land of the Glens comes the judgment of the Glennie in the form of Schuh Limited v Shhh... [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi… [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 1:00 am
Had they done so, Her Ladyship stated that she would have agreed with the minority decision in that case. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 12:34 am
Recalling the national outcry to the House of Lords ruling in YL v Birmingham City Council, it is disheartening to learn that this mechanism is very little used. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 This is not a housing case, but it is an important case on costs in settled claims for judicial review, which is a major issue for many housing practitioners. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm
Bahta & Ors, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department & Ors [2011] EWCA Civ 895 This is not a housing case, but it is an important case on costs in settled claims for judicial review, which is a major issue for many housing practitioners. [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:16 am
– Judith Townend Case Law: CTB v News Group Newspapers: privacy law and the judiciary – Edward Craven Privacy law: the super-injunction is dead Case Law: Mosley v United Kingdom: pre-notification rejected by Strasbourg – Hugh Tomlinson QC Case Law: Goodwin v NGN – Privacy, Intrusion and Novelty – Mark Thomson Case Law: Thornton v Telegraph Media Group, an offer of amends defence fails – Hugh Tomlinson QC Finally, we remind… [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 3:24 pm
However, the Court of Appeal dismissed RP’s claims and refused leave of appeal to the House of Lords. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:27 pm
” Central State Hospital v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 11:01 am
The UK Supreme Court (which was formerly known by that most illustrious of legal trademarks as the “House of Lords”) has just rendered an extraordinarily important judgment in Lucas v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 2:36 am
The current law is now stated in the Equality Act 2010 but the issues in this appeal remain pertinent and are not affected by the revocation of the Regulations. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 9:00 pm
Blackmon v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 3:25 am
It rejects BT arguments that they have no responsibility to act against copyright theft and states that the order is proportionate. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 2:39 am
As Lord Justice Toulson observed: There is no universal yardstick for determining the scope of a state’s positive obligations under article 8. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 5:39 pm
The crucial evidence was that of Ms Barber concerning her state of mind when she wrote the words complained of. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:58 am
The Fab Five are Lord Phillips of Worth Matravers, Lord Walker of Gestingthorpe, Lady Hale of Richmond, Lord Mance of Frognal and Lord Collins of Mapesbury, of whom one (Lord Walker) has served time on the Patents Court and another (Lord Collins) has presided over a pretty robust bit of patent litigation himself. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 2:43 am
Update | Thomas v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
Fantasy Flight Publishing, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:26 am
There is some authority on this point from the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Secretary of state had reasonable grounds for suspecting BF involved in terrorism. [read post]
