Search for: "Marks v. State "
Results 2841 - 2860
of 21,684
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2021, 2:56 pm
Morrison Professor of Law and Faculty Co-Director, Berkeley Center for Law and Business, UC Berkeley School of Law Mark G. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 9:31 am
Given that the state has expressly asked the Court to overturn its landmark decisions in Roe v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 6:17 am
In Chutter, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:21 am
See Couture v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 4:16 am
In essence, the General Court stated that Roshen failed to prove that the goods in question were actually sold and known under that mark during the Imperial or Soviet era in the Baltic States or Poland, this because the evidence relied upon by Roshen only related to Soviet Russia, Ukraine and Belarus. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
Accordingly, the PTO’s absolute ban on the registration of marks such as TRUMP TOO SMALL is far more extensive than necessary to protect the right of publicity, which would not prevent the use of TRUMP TOO SMALL under any state’s right of p [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 8:25 pm
” And Hannah Knowles and María Luisa Paúl of The Washington Post have an article headlined “Abortion bans and sanctuary plans: States are preparing for a possible future without Roe v Wade. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 11:11 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
10 Dec 2021, 9:49 am
" Pulliam v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:24 pm
” And at Education Week, Mark Walsh has a report headlined “Religious Schools and State Aid: What to Glean From a Lively Supreme Court Argument. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 1:43 pm
The case is Javier Cardenas et al. v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 12:31 pm
State v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 6:44 am
” Weitzman v. [read post]
8 Dec 2021, 5:21 am
It starts with a consideration of the Chinese state constitution. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 5:54 pm
ShareThe Supreme Court on Monday heard oral argument in Patel v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 3:25 pm
In Bruesewitz v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 1:10 pm
In the Lotus Case (France v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 10:56 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
& Community Supervision, 151 AD3d 1433, 1433 [2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, 762-763 [1999]). [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:30 am
& Community Supervision, 151 AD3d 1433, 1433 [2017] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter of Swinton v Safir, 93 NY2d 758, 762-763 [1999]). [read post]
