Search for: "Matter of Brown"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 9,185
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2018, 10:04 am
Seek counsel from the Brown Law Offices, P.A. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 9:32 am
Supreme Court to step in and resolve the matter. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 3:00 am
Brown. [read post]
4 Mar 2018, 3:58 am
Meet Sinosure, Leviton Law Firm, and Brown & Joseph [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 4:05 pm
If and when Ring is confirmed by the Senate is another matter (a hearing before the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee concerning Ring took place on March 1 where Ring was questioned on ethics issues). [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 3:51 pm
” Consequently, the Browning-Ferris standard is back in effect, and two or more entities are joint employers of a single workforce if: (1) they are both employers within the meaning of the common law; and (2) they share or co-determine matters governing the essential terms and conditions of employment. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:49 am
Join us.Trevor Brown contributed to this blog.Advancing Justice and Opportunity in the States: Our 2018 Legislative Agenda was originally published in Shriver Center on Medium, where people are continuing the conversation by highlighting and responding to this story. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 8:10 am
Two weeks later, months of conflict came to a head in United States v. al-Nashiri as the military judge overseeing the matter, Col. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 1:37 pm
In today’s case (Greenway-Brown v. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:03 am
The Court held that despite the IRS agent questioning the defendant on a matter unrelated to his being in custody, the obligations of Miranda still remained.) [read post]
NLRB failed to order make-whole remedy for defunct employer’s unilateral rescission of dues checkoff
1 Mar 2018, 6:36 am
Brown, J.D. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 4:38 pm
Should having affordable access to medicine matter or does competition and profit for companies that gain matter? [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:15 pm
This type of request was addressed in Brown v. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 9:40 am
” According to the Inspector General, Hy-Brand was the same “particular matter” as Browning-Ferris because “the Board’s deliberation in Hy-Brand, for all intents and purposes, was a continuation of the Board’s deliberative process in Browning-Ferris” and “involved and affected the legal rights of the parties of Browning-Ferris. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 6:25 am
In the Hy-Brand case, the Trump Board overruled Browning-Ferris in a lengthy opinion articulating why the 2015 decision was legally infirm and unwise as a matter of policy—largely tracing the reasoning of Member Miscimarra’s Browning-Ferris dissent. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:32 am
McCormick points out that like Emanuel, Ring is from a large law firm that represents employers in employment matters. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:32 am
McCormick points out that like Emanuel, Ring is from a large law firm that represents employers in employment matters. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:32 am
McCormick points out that like Emanuel, Ring is from a large law firm that represents employers in employment matters. [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 8:32 am
McCormick points out that like Emanuel, Ring is from a large law firm that represents employers in employment matters. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 6:22 pm
No. 13770(1) (Executive branch employees are prohibited from “participat[ing] in any particular matter involving specific parties that is directly and substantially related to [a] former employer . . . [read post]
