Search for: "Matter of John D." Results 2841 - 2860 of 6,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jan 2013, 11:05 am by Kedar S. Bhatia
As far as why concurrences and dissents without opinion matter, John Kelsh provides an interesting hypothesis about the relevance of this practice during the Taney Court: [T]he Taney period saw a dramatic increase in the use of dissents and concurrences without opinion. [read post]
24 Nov 2019, 3:06 pm by Nancy Rapoport
  (I was going to point my readers* to an online version of an exquisite article by one of my favorite authors–John D. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 7:21 pm by lawmrh
I’d crossed paths with Dottei when I had worked along with others to attempt to establish a state licensing mechanism for Nevada’s private professional guardians. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 4:11 am
Armitage, Deputy Attorney General; D. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 4:50 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
But that still happens because, if we possessed some mutant third hand, on it we'd find the crux of the problem: TDCJ has throughout its history operated on inmate labor and trusties perform functions that would require staff if they weren't fulfilled.I admittedly don't know much about current trusty uses and practices, but with Sen. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 1:36 pm by Daniel D. Blinka
A healthy trend sees law firms, large and small, offering in-house programs that address matters of common interest. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by John Inazu
  I’d be delighted to receive feedback on the manuscript from anyone interested. [read post]
7 Nov 2017, 8:22 pm by Jon Katz
 Brigadier General John Baker — the Chief Defense Counsel for the Guantanamo Military Commission — concurred and relieved the civilian lawyers’s assignment to Al-Nashiri, who is “genuinely like[d]” by his now-former civilian lawyers. [read post]
9 Jun 2017, 4:22 am by Edith Roberts
  If you have or know of a recent (published in the last two or three days) article, post, or op-ed relating to the Court that you’d like us to consider for inclusion in the round-up, please send it to roundup [at] scotusblog.com. [read post]