Search for: "PRECISION STANDARD V US"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 4,554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2013, 6:27 am
Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Indeed, precisely that scenario is how we ended up with Mutual Pharmaceutical Co. v. [read post]
14 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Knellinger v. [read post]
10 Oct 2013, 10:29 pm
United States v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 11:14 am
Co. v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:16 pm
Brown v. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 3:01 pm
Even taking the apparently lower standard of ‘a matter of common sense’, I think common sense cannot support the view that hearsay evidence can in any way corroborate other hearsay evidence. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 11:31 pm
The ECtHR applies to this case the doctrine of “presumption of compliance”, which it had previously used in Bosphorus v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 8:07 pm
--City of East Lake v. [read post]
5 Oct 2013, 1:53 pm
Italy 2011, Povse v. [read post]
2 Oct 2013, 3:18 am
Swingle urges the court to look at the precise terms of the FOIA requests in each case, pointing out that in the D.C. [read post]
1 Oct 2013, 5:53 pm
--Whitman v. [read post]
30 Sep 2013, 5:37 am
But it might be that for purposes of a given provision, it wouldn’t work to precise, so instead you make use of vagueness and its uncertain boundaries—you use words such as reasonable. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 10:03 am
Germany, Liberty and Others v. the United Kingdom and Kennedy v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 2:49 pm
This is not to suggest the odd formalism of Lochner v. [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 7:04 am
GE v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 9:24 am
Co. v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 5:25 am
Gustavson v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am
What did the court (actually, a magistrate) find could meet that standard? [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 7:43 am
., MA Two RNs successfully obtained certification of a class of RNs who provided direct patient care in short term acute care facilities while employed by eight Detroit area hospitals from December 12, 2002, through the present by demonstrating predominance and superiority (Cason-Merenda v. [read post]
