Search for: "People v Walls" Results 2841 - 2860 of 3,688
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Apr 2011, 7:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Supreme Court's ruling in Citizens United v. [read post]
8 Apr 2011, 2:59 am by Marie Louise
The People) (Recording Industry vs The People) Viacom – YouTube should not be required to use software filters, Public Knowledge tells Court: Viacom v YouTube (Public Knowledge) (Electronic Frontier Foundation) US Trade Marks & Domain Names – Decisions District Court N D Georgia: Trademark owner gets injunction against keyword ad campaign that generated no sales for the advertiser: InternetShopsInc.com v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 7:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
(Terminology: not indigenous people but local culture: Carribean nations, Kenyans say: we don’t have indigenous people, but we do have local culture.) [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:30 am by Venkat
My understanding is that people (or companies) that you are not "friends" with cannot post messages to your wall or message you, so the people who received unwanted wall posts or messages in question had to take an affirmative step before they were sent the messages in question. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:03 am by stevemehta
Mehta A very interesting decision regarding medicare reimbursement rights came down that will affect how people can litigate their cases and how they must determine medicare reimbursement rights. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 5:13 am by INFORRM
See Reynolds v Times Newspapers Limited [2001] 2 AC 127 HL, which created the defence, and Jameel v Wall Street Journal Europe Sprl [2007] 1 AC 359 HL, which revitalised it. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:51 pm
In "Minnow Microsoft v the Google Giant", posted on the BBC website today, Rory Cellan-Jones writes on the competition-based complaint lodged by Microsoft with the European Commission. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 10:11 am by tjsllibrary
They also are available through Google eBooks, a new online book store that allows people to purchase and read books on different devices. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
§ 26.1     Adequacy of Expert Witness Disclosures  The Case: Walls v. [read post]
29 Mar 2011, 8:30 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
Bush astutely noted, elections have consequences.Allowing our elections to be decided by massive corporations that put profits before people has consequences, too.The Supreme Court's Citizens United v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:10 am by Rebecca Tushnet
“Just because I posted on the ‘being fat’ FB group wall doesn’t mean I need diet pill ads. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 5:32 am by Mike Scarcella
Super-Sized: The Washington Post examines the closely watched sex discrimination class action Wal-Mart v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 12:00 am by George M. Wallace
Supreme Court in the affirmative action case of United Steelworkers of America v. [read post]