Search for: "People v. Bear"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 5,251
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2023, 4:00 am
My colleague, Chantel Levy, wrote an excellent overview of the considerations a decision maker should bear in mind when making a finding of credibility, including consistency, corroborative evidence, plausibility, and motive. [read post]
Georgia criminal lawyer obtains immunity for client after pretrial hearing in domestic violence case
23 Mar 2009, 3:49 pm
In State v. [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 3:38 pm
People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 2:58 pm
One can imagine institutional differences that would immunize the Court, though Holder v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:36 pm
The Supreme Court agreed to return to the arena of terrorism Monday when they granted cert in Clapper v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 11:25 am
In construction accident law, determining liability can be complicated for the simple fact that there are so many people on a construction site, and they may bear some varying degree of fault. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:37 am
He said the morning after the release of the opinion in Texas v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 8:25 pm
One example is found in a case the Seventh Circuit decided last week, Gonzalez v. [read post]
17 Aug 2013, 3:16 am
Supreme Court in 1996 ruled in Pennsylvania v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:50 am
McConnell , supra , at 144 (quoting Nixon v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 8:46 am
Sewell v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 9:26 am
The case, Patco Construction Company v. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 1:16 pm
Correction Law Article 6-C, the Sex Offender Registration Act, effective 21 January 1996, modeled after New Jersey's "Megan's Law", was meant to address the need to protect the public from the risk of repeat offenses by perpetrators of sex crimes, deemed inherently susceptible to recidivism as held in People v. [read post]
30 May 2024, 10:03 am
The court wrote: Bearing in mind that the NSL was enacted to “prevent, suppress and punish” conducts and activities which endangered national security, we could not see any reason why the [National People’s Congress] would have so narrowly restricted “other unlawful means” in [Article 22 of the China-imposed National Security Law] to acts which would entail the use of “force or threat of force”. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 12:48 pm
" Heinrich v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:47 am
Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the case of Perry v. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 7:08 am
In last week’s claim (Ryan v. [read post]
26 Mar 2007, 12:05 pm
(I'd even cite Nazi research if, in fact, it provides usable information about how to treat sick people and save lives. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
USDA v. [read post]
21 Nov 2015, 6:44 am
Massachusetts 14-10078Issue: (1) Whether a stun gun is an “arm” within the meaning of the Second Amendment, and (2) whether Massachusetts’s blanket prohibition on the possession of stun guns infringes the right of the people to keep and bear arms in violation of the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. [read post]
