Search for: "People v. Day"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 23,452
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2018, 6:21 am
The Supreme Court holds that a Minnesota law that prohibits people from wearing political clothing in a polling place violates the First Amendment.The case is Minnesota Voters Alliance v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 5:22 pm
There is something about putting on a black robe that makes people need an audience. [read post]
31 Oct 2016, 5:50 am
People v. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 7:14 am
The Supreme Court's decision in the Stolen Valor Act case, United States v. [read post]
2 Jan 2010, 6:18 pm
People v. [read post]
31 Aug 2018, 10:36 am
In Hass v. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 4:10 pm
People v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:38 am
On Wednesday, May 12, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court issued an order staying further trial court proceedings in the matter of People v. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 5:57 am
The most time-sensitive pending case is Trump v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 7:45 am
Many people likely remember that, the U.S. [read post]
26 May 2010, 7:38 pm
On May 25, 2010, the Michigan Court of Appeals published its opinion in People v. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:23 am
In People v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 3:10 pm
In Dina v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 4:50 pm
Today the Court of Appeals held that a criminal defendant waives a statute of limitations defense by pleading guilty - People v Parilla, 2007 NY Slip Op 05133. [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 6:22 am
The justices announced late Friday that they will hear oral argument on Nov. 30 in Trump v. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 4:24 am
I've written about the importance of access to post-conviction DNA testing and about District Attorney's Office for the Third Judicial District v. [read post]
10 Dec 2022, 6:15 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 1:11 pm
THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. [read post]
19 Nov 2008, 12:32 am
In the days after the decision, there was no lack of op-ed fallout. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 6:00 am
The case that was previously posted on and that is currently under review by the California Supreme Court is People v. [read post]
