Search for: "People v. Fair" Results 2841 - 2860 of 10,543
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jul 2012, 11:26 am by Dan Gauss
U.S.: The Court ruled that the Fair Sentencing Act of 2010, which reduced the disparity in federal sentencing between crack and powder cocaine, applies to people whose offenses predate the law but who were sentenced after its passage. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 4:40 am by Ben
”Herein, it seems important to discuss the case of Keep Thomson v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 6:47 am by Lisa Stam
As an example of the high-risk employers face when trying to push out an older worker without a fair package, in Dawe v. [read post]
18 May 2025, 4:30 am by Anderson Franco Law
This is because most people have insurance to cover accidents, like car insurance. [read post]
24 May 2016, 4:41 am by Karen Ainslie
The Labour Court said the following: “It amounts to nepotism and corruption to become involved in the recruitment process of people to whom you feel favourable, in circumstances where you do not make full disclosure. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Fan fiction/fair use in copyright is different in trademark where people make and often sell stuff. [read post]
11 Apr 2025, 5:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
It is no part of the oath’, and its absence is a defect curable by subsequent affidavits or testimony” (People v Zimmer, 112 AD2d 500, 501 [3d Dept 1985], citing People ex rel. [read post]
30 May 2018, 7:19 pm by John Floyd
Supreme Court Justice Felix Frankfurter in a concurring opinion of United States v. [read post]
3 May 2011, 11:09 am by By Erik Lundegaard
" [laughs] A lot of times you can say, "You have a fair chance. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 8:11 am
  Excerpt:Whether justice and fairness are, at some level, hard-wired into us (see Brain reacts to fairness as it does to money and chocolate) or culturally controlled, it seems that Rawls' conception of "justice and fairness" based upon reasonableness and enlightened self-interest might flow more or less naturally from a mediated dispute resolution forum where the parties, rather than the mediator, are in control. [read post]
They argued that providing opportunities to only these students discriminated on the basis of race, violating the US Constitution’s Equal Protection Clause and running afoul of the US Supreme Court’s recent decision in Students for Fair Admission v. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 7:53 am by Jeff Gamso
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.I'm back to the Second Amendment because of this comment, because I find my own views on the Second Amendment so at odds with how I see the world, and because, frankly, I haven't figured out just what I want to say about Judge Bolton's order in United States v. [read post]