Search for: "Peoples v. United States" Results 2841 - 2860 of 20,862
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm by ccoleburn
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
30 Mar 2023, 3:54 pm
Thirty-eight should have been the magic number: Article V of the United States Constitution, which lays out the process for Constitutional amendments, provides that a proposed amendment becomes part of the Constitution as soon as it is ratified by ¾ of the states. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Sherry F. Colb
United States as conferring constitutional status on the warnings and the associated exclusionary rule. [read post]
11 May 2016, 8:58 am by Eric Goldman
Still, the case highlights the growing disparity in the legal regulation of search indexes between the United States and the rest of the world. [read post]
28 Dec 2023, 1:22 pm
 The NTA alleged that Rodriguez (1) was not a citizen or national of the United States, (2) was a native and citizen of Mexico, (3) had entered the United States near Otay Mesa, California, on approximately September 27, 2010, and (4) had not been admitted or paroled after inspection by an immigration officer. . . . [read post]
Supreme Court itself recognized, "state courts are absolutely free to interpret state constitutional provisions to accord greater protection to individual rights than do similar provisions of the United States Constitution….The modification or reformulation of a privacy test is possible, thus, at the state level. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:36 am by Mark Ashton
Since the late 1890s the United States has also adopted the view that people enjoy a right of privacy. [read post]
19 Apr 2009, 9:09 pm
  In fact, Hasan Simmons has first-hand experience of this scenario, and the loss of one of his jurors because her child was ill is one of the issues in United States v. [read post]