Search for: "Press v. State" Results 2841 - 2860 of 17,745
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm by INFORRM
The News Media Association has said there are “grounds for judicial review” of the decision to recognise Impress as a state-approved press regulator. [read post]
12 Jan 2023, 5:28 am by INFORRM
In Zemmour v France [2022] ECHR 1130 (in French only), the Fifth Section of the European Court of Human Rights held, unanimously, that the Article 10 right of the applicant, a journalist and political commentator, had not been violated by his conviction for inciting discrimination and religious hatred against the Muslim community in France under s.24 § 7 of the Freedom of the Press Act of 29 July 1881. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 5:52 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” Since the Supreme Court’s 1978 opinion in Oliphant v. [read post]
9 Dec 2024, 1:25 am by INFORRM
United States On 2 December 2024, judgment was handed down dismissing the appeal in State of Washington v Meta Platforms, Inc., — P.3d —, 2024 WL 4929812 (Wash. [read post]
3 Jan 2025, 4:05 pm by Lawrence Solum
Sloss (Santa Clara University - School of Law) has posted People v. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 2:25 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
For judgment, please download: [2011] UKSC 34 For the Court’s press summary, please download: Press Summary For a non-PDF version of the judgment, please visit: BAILII [read post]
19 Oct 2009, 9:51 am by michael
From a Columbus Bar Association press release last Wednesday: The Columbus Bar Association announced today that the Supreme Court of Ohio, in a unanimous decision in Columbus Bar Assn. v. [read post]
A panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit Friday heard oral arguments in Maryland Shall Issue Inc. et. al. v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 4:16 am
Supreme Court in Hazelwood School District v. [read post]
29 Jan 2010, 10:18 am by admin@lawiscoool.com (Omar Ha-Redeye)
In a press release sent to this site Diana Juricevic, Director of the International Human Rights Program at UofT Faculty of Law, stated, We are very disappointed with the decision. [read post]