Search for: "State v. C. R." Results 2841 - 2860 of 13,581
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2018, 7:12 am by Laurence Lai
In full: C-III, 5 – Summons to oral proceedings as the first action in examination 5. [read post]
1 Oct 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
28 Sep 2018, 12:39 pm by Guest Blogger
State Bar Director Christy Amuny of Beaumont and Granbury attorney Cindy V. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:00 am by Administrator
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
Jarrett Dieterle, R Street Institute] California fisheries and Chevron deference: “An Otter Travesty by the Administrative State” [Ilya Shapiro on Cato cert amicus petition in California Sea Urchin Commission v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:19 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
[1] Court of Justice of the European Union Case C-422/16 Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v TofuTown.com GmbH. [2] Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 671). [3] Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, Standard 2.5.1. [4]… [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 8:19 pm by Georgina Hey (AU)
[1] Court of Justice of the European Union Case C-422/16 Verband Sozialer Wettbewerb eV v TofuTown.com GmbH. [2] Regulation (EU) No 1308/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 December 2013 establishing a common organisation of the markets in agricultural products and repealing Council Regulations (EEC) No 922/72, (EEC) No 234/79, (EC) No 1037/2001 and (EC) No 1234/2007 (OJ 2013 L 347, p. 671). [3] Australia New Zealand Food Standards Code, Standard 2.5.1. [4]… [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 7:33 am by Lindsay A. Heller
This will also help define who does the driving – an important issue in recent a blog post by Sandra C. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 8:23 am by Chantal DeSereville
In its reasoning the ERT adopted the interpretation of “taking” adopted by the Ontario Court of Justice in R. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2018, 4:47 am by Dennis Crouch
Life Technologies Corporation, et al., No. 17-1669 (timing of a new trial motion — does the 28-day rule of R.50(d) apply). [read post]