Search for: "State v. Country" Results 2841 - 2860 of 26,679
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2018, 2:25 am by Aimee Denholm
The substantive issues in this case concerned the position under the Directive 2004/38/EC of a child who is a third country national but has been placed in the legal guardianship of EU citizens under the Islamic “kefalah” system in her own country. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 11:00 pm by Rosalind English
R(on the application of Sayed) v Secretary of State for the Home Department; R(on the application of Patel) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1059 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that Article 8 of the Convention need not necessarily be considered when deciding whether to grant an applicant indefinite leave to remain. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 9:33 am by Joseph Landau
  Justice Black’s opinion in Afroyim v. [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 3:03 am
Just about every state in the country has a law designed to protect consumers where they have been harmed or injured as a result of the misrepresentation of products or services. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 2:45 pm by National Indian Law Library
Courts of Appeals Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/currentcta.htmCases featured:United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2017, 9:43 am by Zietlow, Rebecca E.
"  How could Ashley have made this statement four years after the United States Supreme Court declared a constitutional right to own slaves in the infamous decision of Dred Scott v. [read post]
28 Jul 2019, 5:21 pm by Stuart Kaplow
And the 38 page decision in Board of County Commissioners of Washington County v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:19 am by Amy Howe
  Writing for this blog, Lyle summarizes the state of play around the country, while Chris Geidner does the same at BuzzFeed. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 11:32 pm by Jeremy
Here's the final guest post from Chijioke Ifeoma Okorie, who has now joined the regular Afro-IP team:The Least Developed Countries’ agitation for an extension of the deadline within which they must comply with TRIPS reminds me of the decision of Nigeria’s High Court affirmed by the Court of Appeal in CA/L/573/2008: Microsoft Corporation v Franike Associates Limited. [read post]