Search for: "State v. K. T."
Results 2841 - 2860
of 3,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2010, 8:00 am
I'll be posting the links to Monday's and Tuesday's posts shortly. - K [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 11:24 am
(h/t K&L Gates's Electronic Discovery Law) Related posts: "Judge Offers to Facebook 'Friend' Witnesses in Order to Resolve Discovery Dispute -- Barnes v. [read post]
24 Oct 2010, 10:14 am
KPMG and Teachers’ Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
23 Oct 2010, 12:17 pm
Manatt Phelps & Phillips didn’t admit any wrongdoing but did agree to pay $550,000 to New York State to settle the firm’s misdeeds in the investigation of corruption in the state’s pension investments. [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 9:36 am
According to Gujarat High Court sources, there are approximately two lac cheque bouncing cases all over t he State, with the majority of them (84,000 cases) in Ahmedabad, followed by Surat, Vadodara and Rajkot. 73,000 cases were filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (cheque bouncing) on a single day by a private telecom company before a Bangalore court, informed the Chief Justice of India, K. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:24 am
John K. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 3:01 pm
This is why – in agreement with decisions T 171/84, T 226/85 and T 203/83 (sic), which state that the skilled person is able to recognise that there is an error in the specification and rectify it using his knowledge – the Board has no doubt to conclude in the present, case where the error is simply due to the inversion of two figures, that the skilled person is able to identify without any difficulty the error of transcription in the reference to… [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 12:35 pm
Sentencing Commission, Judge William K. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 7:44 am
Vandever and Cynthia K. [read post]
19 Oct 2010, 3:21 am
"In diversity cases, 'state statutes of limitations govern the timeliness of state law claims', and state law 'determines the related questions of what events serve to commence an action and to toll the statute of limitations.'" Diffley v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
On that basis, Mr Hardy's state of mind at the time of sending the email amounted to "reckless indifference to the illegality of his act" (Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 ). [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 11:40 am
On that basis, Mr Hardy's state of mind at the time of sending the email amounted to "reckless indifference to the illegality of his act" (Three Rivers DC v Bank of England (No 3) [2003] 2 AC 1 ). [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 11:58 am
(United States v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 8:08 am
At Tuesday’s oral argument in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 4:20 pm
” “Justice came in the form of a $604,515.66 judgment against Erin K. [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 2:44 pm
How many policies, worldwide, started from a desire to f**k with the Jews? [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 11:56 am
But we have had a chance to review yesterday afternoon’s oral argument transcript in Bruesewitz v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 4:14 pm
These are some of the facts in the case of Velez v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:03 pm
Suffice to say for the present that this was a second appeal from a s.204 appeal that nearly didn’t make it, as shortly before the Court of Appeal hearing, it turned out – to everyone’s surprise, including their own solicitor’s – that the appellant and his wife weren’t actually homeless anymore, having had two ASTs since the hearing of the s.204 appeal. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:48 pm
New York State Department [read post]
