Search for: "State v. Plant"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 4,040
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2019, 7:23 am
Hadley v. [read post]
31 Dec 2008, 7:18 am
Those interested in the issue should read a recent federal opinion called Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Feb 2025, 5:01 am
Ed Meese planted the seeds. [read post]
28 Apr 2019, 8:32 pm
A recent Court of Appeal decision, Inzana v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:59 am
The Court of First Instance dismissed Mr Torresan's appeal. * It noted that cannabis has three meanings: (i) a textile plant the market in which is regulated within the Community framework and the production of which is subject to very strict legislation as regards the content of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the active ingredient of cannabis; (ii) a narcotic which is prohibited in a great number of Member States; (iii) the possible therapeutic use of which is under review. [read post]
30 Oct 2015, 1:00 pm
” Background In California Department of Transportation v. [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 4:05 am
The City appealed, and the Southern District of the Missouri Court of Appeals in City of Kimberling City v. [read post]
18 Aug 2020, 9:05 pm
In Urgenda v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 10:27 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Cecilia Sbrolli re-imagines the decision in the case Fuller v. [read post]
7 May 2019, 2:27 pm
That was one of the questions posed to a Utah jury in Bimbo Bakeries USA, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 4:00 am
“Not since Bush v. [read post]
21 Feb 2006, 10:01 pm
Plant v. [read post]
16 Jul 2021, 6:04 am
When Droste v. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 4:05 am
State, 317 Md. 408 (1989). [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 7:36 am
And in Erlinger v. [read post]
7 Dec 2020, 12:33 pm
Doe 1 and Cargill, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2013, 8:55 am
The state and the Park District jointly prepared the Eastshore State Park General Plan. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:58 pm
(United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 10:41 am
Undeterred by the narrow question on which the Court granted cert., thirteen state petitioners ask it to overrule Massachusetts v. [read post]