Search for: "Strong v. State"
Results 2841 - 2860
of 16,386
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2013, 6:00 am
In Haag v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 10:13 pm
The Massachusetts Court of Appeals in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 6:56 am
The defendant filed a motion to exclude, which was granted by the court Facts: This case (Siegel v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 5:17 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 9:42 am
Case citation: Mobile Mini v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 8:27 am
United Airlines (“Ward”) and Oman v. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 2:47 am
Nicastro v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:17 am
In Sierra Club v. [read post]
26 Sep 2009, 12:54 pm
Conrad v. [read post]
1 Apr 2019, 10:39 am
Indeed, the standard letter that is sent to parties in this court states: "Our court has a strong presumption of public access to our court's records, and the court scrutinizes any request by a party to seal .... [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 4:03 pm
The Court rightly finds a violation of Article 10 of the ECHR due to the far-reaching restriction of Mr Pryanishnikov’s freedom of expression, having taken into consideration that the authorities had no strong evidence to substantiate the suspicion of any misconduct of the applicant. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Circuit, Case No. 11-1302, EME Homer City Generation, L.P v. [read post]
29 Aug 2022, 2:02 pm
We should not lightly attribute that intent to the Legislature, particularly given California’s “strong public policy to protect children of tender years” (People v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm
As we’ve previously written, California already takes a strong position against employee noncompete agreements. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 8:39 pm
In Amica Mutual Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 2:58 pm
Which s/he does, reading the relevant CALCRIM instruction.And, of course, the relevant CALCRIM instruction accurately states the law. [read post]
30 Aug 2022, 8:06 am
Hence the Court of Appeal's ruling that says he's entitled to be released.At the same time, my strong sense is this: Mr. [read post]
6 Jan 2017, 11:40 am
In Botosan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 10:57 am
A strong case of prima facie obviousness, such as that presented here, cannot be overcome by a far weaker showing of objective indicia of nonobviousness. [read post]
