Search for: "Warne v. State" Results 2841 - 2860 of 14,219
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jun 2014, 4:58 am by Amy Howe
  In United States v. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 10:32 am by Ad Law Defense
  The California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment (OEHHA) just proposed a new regulation providing that cancer warnings would not be required for coffee, stating (in effect) that the health benefits of consuming coffee outweigh the cancer risk posed by acrylamide. [read post]
15 Nov 2016, 4:40 pm by INFORRM
On 4 November, Mr Justice Nicol handed down an anonymised judgment in ERY v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2016] EWHC 2760 (QB)). [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 1:22 am
 Infringement - The de minimis principle in quia timet actionsThe de minimis principle has been considered in previous patent authorities (Hoechst v BP [1998], Monsanto v Cargill [2007], Napp v Ratiopharm [2009], Lundbeck v Norpharma [2011]). [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 5:20 am
Next door in Alabama, compliance with government warning requirements precluded a finding of "wantonness" necessary to punitive damages in Richards v. [read post]
15 Sep 2010, 7:23 pm by Brian Shiffrin
When an appellant successfully challenges a conviction which followed a trial, the imposition of an increased sentence after a retrial is presumed to violate the Due Process Clause of the New York State Constitution, even where the retrial is before a different judge than imposed the original sentence (People v Van Pelt, 76 NY2d 156, 158 [1990]). [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
There's red tide in Texas, salinity levels in state waters are way off in Mississippi, and Louisiana has fallen behind Washington state in oyster production. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 3:02 pm by Anna Christensen
Arguing on behalf of the state, Michigan Solicitor General Eric Restuccia began by emphasizing the Court’s decision in North Carolina v. [read post]