Search for: "ALL POTENTIAL CLAIMANTS" Results 2861 - 2880 of 4,874
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2014, 3:16 am by Jon Gelman
The entire Plaintiffs' Steering Committee has continued to stay focused and determined in pursuing all potential recoveries for the people of the Gulf Coast. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 10:33 am by Ray Dowd
   Claimant: For purposes of copyright registration, the claimant is either the author of the work that has been submitted for registration, or a person or organization that owns all of the rights under copyright that initially belonged to the author of that work. [read post]
1 Sep 2014, 12:49 am by Giles Peaker
As Mr Bryce fairly acknowledged, all that the appellant can point to is a degree of uncertainty in the past and a degree of uncertainty as to the future. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 9:10 am by James Hand
 This was, to an extent, due to the unreliability of both claimant and respondent. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 5:23 am
Plaintiff unsuccessfully argued that, for purposes of calculating the aggregate amount in controversy, it was inappropriate for the court to include as members of the putative class all 1300 claimants supposedly assisted by defendants because the claims of many potential class members would be time-barred by a 1-year statute of limitations. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 5:06 am
The claimant successfully proved breach of contract, breach of confidence and breach of statutory duty, but was only awarded nominal damages of £1. [read post]
25 Aug 2014, 3:23 am by Broc Romanek
MD&A cases are not brought all that frequently – read about other MD&A enforcement actions on pages 48-52 of our “MD&A Handbook” This is the BofA case in a nutshell: BofA admitted that it failed to disclose known uncertainties regarding potential increased costs related to mortgage loan repurchase claims stemming from more than $2 trillion in residential mortgage sales from ’04 through ’08 by the bank and certain companies it acquired. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 11:10 am by Eric Goldman
Given Google’s incentives when evaluating de-indexing requests—potential punishment for denying a de-indexing request, no immediate complaints for accepting a de-indexing request—odds are high that Google will err on the side of de-indexing. [read post]
19 Aug 2014, 12:17 am
And the burden of proof remains with the successful claimant to show how the damage was caused. [read post]
14 Aug 2014, 5:57 am by Adam Weinstein
As a result, the complaint alleged that over a nearly nine year period where the broader market indexes have hit all-time highs, claimants have lost significant sums their investments. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 9:30 pm by Brandon Kenney
Not well at all, according to a 2009 report by the U.S. [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 6:06 am by INFORRM
In this case, it was only necessary for the court to consider what was meant by “has caused” (i.e. looking backwards) rather than the alternative “is likely to cause” (i.e. looking forwards to potentially serious harm). [33] As to the date from which past harm (‘has caused’) or future harm (‘likely to cause’) should be assessed, the Judge accepted the Claimants’ submission that the date in either case should be the date on which… [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:42 pm by H. Scott Leviant
  The Berman statutes, we observed, provide for fee shifting, mandatory undertaking, and several other protections to assist wage claimants should the wage dispute proceed to litigation. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 9:22 pm by H. Scott Leviant
  However, a defense in which liability itself is predicated on factual questions specific to individual claimants poses a much greater challenge to manageability.Slip op., at 25. [read post]
The plaintiffs’ potential class included all businesses inGloucesterCountythat experienced income loss of less than $75,000. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 10:38 pm
If all factions give written consent to join, who has authority to terminate membership? [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 2:06 pm by Dave
 That was the Claimant’s position. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 8:15 am by Giles Peaker
Delay of itself is not a reason to refuse such permission (Rahman) The Claimant argued three possible or potential outcomes to be considered. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 5:19 pm by INFORRM
 Most operators, if there is any potential for liability, will adopt the safest course and take down the material. [read post]