Search for: "Akins v. State"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 3,091
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2008, 1:09 pm
The United Stated District Court of Arizona has just decided on the case of Blizzard Entertainment v MDY, and it's a doozy. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 8:47 pm
See United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
State Farm Mut. [read post]
14 Jul 2008, 9:17 am
First, on August 20, 2007, In re Seagate Technology, LLC changed the standard of willful infringement from one akin to negligence to that of objective recklessness. 497 F.3d 1360, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 8:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 3:09 pm
What if several influential Democrats stated that they would not confirm such a nominee? [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 7:03 pm
Instead, the court of appeals relied on the Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
3 Jul 2008, 10:34 am
U.S. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2008, 9:33 pm
"); Washington State Grange v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 4:00 am
(Fortunately, Hiibel v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 9:00 pm
(Fortunately, Hiibel v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:10 pm
The State is at no risk of that. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:29 pm
Yesterday in No. 07-330, Greenlaw v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 7:14 pm
In State v. [read post]
24 Jun 2008, 2:12 pm
L.P. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
(Disclosure: Akin Gump represents the petitioner) Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner's reply Brief amicus curiae of Veterans for America (in support of the petition) Brief amicus curiae of Former Prosecutors (in support of the petition) __________________ Docket: 07-1122 Case name: Arizona v. [read post]
23 Jun 2008, 8:13 am
Supreme Court rulings, including this month's Quanta Computer Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 3:16 pm
Marty asks whether this provision violates the principles of United States v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:30 pm
Based on an earlier Ninth Circuit decision, Pallas v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 6:17 pm
I guess my first thought was whether it has any impact on State v. [read post]
