Search for: "B. Smith" Results 2861 - 2880 of 5,330
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2024, 9:17 pm by The Law Blogger
 We've known defense counsel Shannon Smith, and currently have our own capital case with Smith's former law partner Mariel Lehman, James Crumbley's defense counsel. [read post]
14 Jan 2013, 7:30 am by Donna Boehme
Greg Smith wrote about it in his spectacular “take-this-job-and-shove-it” New York Times op-ed (key word: “muppets”). [read post]
22 Mar 2018, 4:44 am by Ben
Second, even had the Gayes preserved their challenge, neither Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 50(b) nor our decisions in Westinghouse and El-Hakem v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 3:14 pm
We've written about Ostler-Smith percentage of bonus income orders, and that is not what today's blog is about. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 7:11 am
David Zaring and Gordon Smith have some interesting comments over on the ‘Glom, as does Larry Ribstein on his blog. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 8:33 am
The Court noted their decisions in Moore and Jacobs offered insight regarding the proper interpretation and interplay of W.R.Cr.P. 35(b) and W.R.A.P. 6.01(b). [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 6:36 am by Joy Waltemath
More importantly, the Second Circuit stated, the conclusion in Sacks is no longer tenable following the Supreme Court’s decision in Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 10:57 am by Jonathan Holbrook
Summary of the Rules For a recap of Rules 803(6) (“business records”) and 803(8) (“public records”), see Professor Smith’s previous blog posts here and here. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:22 pm
Professor Larry Ribstein weighs in here, and Professor Gordon Smith adds to his previous commentary on the case here. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 11:03 am by Layla Kuhl
  MCL 777.31” The Court again considered the applications in People v Corrin and People v Miller, which were held in abeyance pending the decision in People v Smith, which was decided this past December. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 8:40 am by Joy Waltemath
Thus, the court in an unpublished opinion denied without prejudice the pharmaceutical giant’s motion to dismiss and/or strike the claims (Smith v Merck & Co, Inc, October 8, 2014, Pisano, J). [read post]
8 Dec 2011, 1:15 pm by John Elwood
  The Court appears to be holding Smith v. [read post]