Search for: "BES v. State" Results 2861 - 2880 of 68,825
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2011, 8:16 am
Martin v Martin 2011 NY Slip Op 00197 Decided on January 11, 2011 Appellate Division, Second Department The parties’ stipulation of settlement, incorporated but not merged into their judgment of divorce, states that husband had multiple sclerosis and that the agreed support amounts were based on husband’s being physically capable of earning $150,000 per year. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 6:24 am by Joy
As the Court in Rutledge v Canaan Construction Inc., 2020 ONSC 4246 (CanLII) stated, if a termination clause can be interpreted as being “even a potential violation of the ESA, no matter how remote, [it] should be unenforceable”- Simran Bakshi, TorontoVisit our Toronto Law Office website: www.wiselaw.net Visit our website: www.wiselaw.net [read post]
1 May 2009, 2:20 am
An intriguing aspect of West Virginia State Board of Education v. [read post]
7 Jan 2016, 7:16 am by Bryan P. Sears
You may remember that Miller, in a letter in early December, criticized the state’s tax collector for not focusing on his job and instead being distracted by issues outside ... [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 5:46 am by Admin
Adarsh Textiles said that, “granting subsidies in power tariff to certain sectors is the prerogative of the State Government and that “subsidy being a concession could not be enforced as a matter of right. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 10:35 am
.* I’ve written before (here and here) about federal criminal defendants in the Ninth Circuit who have been rewarded by being clever about their cases.** And, in United States v. [...] [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:00 pm
In 1999, the Supreme Count of the United State held that a guilty plea does not waive the self-incrimination privilege at sentencing in a case called Mitchell v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 9:07 am by Maureen Cosgrove
[JURIST] The US Supreme Court [official website; JURIST news archive] on Monday affirmed [opinion, PDF] a lower court decision in Flores-Villar v. [read post]