Search for: "Bader v. Bader" Results 2861 - 2880 of 2,997
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2019, 10:53 am by Amy Howe
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg led the way, asking Clement what was left of his case, if his clients had already received everything they wanted. [read post]
5 May 2020, 7:57 am by Jessica Litman
Ross relied heavily on an 1888 Supreme Court decision, Goodyear’s India Rubber Glove v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Two recent cases illustrate the point.One of Breyer’s most notable majority opinions—Whole Woman’s Health v. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Usually the Fifth Circuit is given credit for creating the exception in 1972, in McClure v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:48 am by centerforartlaw
Referring to the backlash, she discussed the issues at stake, especially the aftermath of the overturn of Roe v. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am by Amy Howe
” Two months after the oral argument in the Wisconsin case, the justices announced that they would also review the Maryland case, known in the Supreme Court as Benisek v. [read post]
17 Nov 2016, 7:54 am by Victoria Kwan
Meanwhile, at the Jewish Federations of North America’s 2016 General Assembly, Kenneth Feinberg asked Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg how the court would be affected by the election. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:05 pm by Joshua Burd
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Sonia Sotomayor indicated that they would have granted hearing the case. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 5:31 pm
  The problem may be how, in legal terms, the Court might fashion a ruling with that result — and nothing more — in the case of FCC v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:21 pm by Lyle Denniston
On the surface, all that might seem to be at stake in Zivotofsky v. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am by Kali Borkoski
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 4:16 pm by Amy Howe
  Let’s talk about yesterday’s hearing in Glossip v. [read post]
15 Sep 2022, 7:14 am by JURIST Staff
And of course, all three Trump-appointed justices joined the Court’s other conservatives to overturn Roe v. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:43 am by Lyle Denniston
Many of the Justices spent serious efforts during the one-hour argument in National Aeronautics and Space Administration v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:44 am by Lyle Denniston
If there was one strategic error by counsel in Schwarzenegger v. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am by Andrew Hamm
” Yet in this same piece, Everett quoted Paul as asking, rhetorically, “Wouldn’t you rather have Kavanaugh than Ruth Bader Ginsburg? [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In blue New York State, where I live and work, since even before the Supreme Court’s 1973 decision in Roe v. [read post]