Search for: "California v. Law"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 34,277
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2021, 12:34 pm
In Ferra v. [read post]
16 Jun 2020, 6:15 am
The Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in Texas v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 12:15 am
See Steinberg v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 9:01 pm
No one knows for sure what the Supreme Court is going to do with Hollingsworth v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 5:55 pm
Mapes v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Subsequent Case Law: In Litke O’Farrell, LLC v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 3:00 am
Subsequent Case Law: In Litke O’Farrell, LLC v. [read post]
12 Feb 2008, 12:54 pm
In the interim, the California Court of Appeal issued a ruling in Combs v. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 11:16 am
P’ship v. [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 1:28 am
By Robert Milligan, Kurt Kappes and James McNairy The California Supreme Court released its highly anticipated decision in Edwards v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 2:23 pm
Which holds, in a split opinion, that even though the Unfair Competition Law permits a district attorney to bring a lawsuit in the name of the People of the State of California (and obtain relief on behalf of everyone injured), the law doesn't actually do that, and a local DA is instead limited to civil UCL claims in its own jurisdiction.There's something to be said for the majority view. [read post]
13 Jun 2013, 8:39 pm
(Schofield v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 11:01 am
" The California Supreme Court's ruling in Cabral v. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 9:15 am
California Coastal Comm'n, 483 U.S. 825 (1987); Kaiser Aetna v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 2:25 pm
Supreme Court decision Beecher v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 4:00 pm
The Plaintiff in Main Street Plaza v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 3:05 pm
Eating Disorders: CALIFORNIA LAW REQUIRES COVERAGE OF RESIDENTIAL TREATMENT FOR ANOREXIA, COURT RULES, Harlick v. [read post]
30 Jul 2017, 12:59 pm
In Williams v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 12:11 pm
Perhaps it would apply California law. [read post]