Search for: "California v. Texas" Results 2861 - 2880 of 4,429
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Sep 2012, 7:15 am by Andrew R. Boortz
Thus, courts in California, Texas, or even other parts of New York can disagree with Judge Weinstein's findings. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 7:32 am by Marissa Miller
” Briefly: This blog continues its symposium on Fisher v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 11:39 am by Michael Rosman
  That plan, adopted by the Texas legislature in the wake of the Fifth Circuit’s ruling in Hopwood v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Richard Ford
  Voters in Texas are perfectly capable of forcing public universities to change their admissions policies, as voters in California did by banning affirmative action statewide with Proposition 209. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:24 am by Roger Clegg
Nor does it make sense for the Court to warn schools – for the third time, after University of California Regents v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:36 pm by Richard Kahlenberg
In the words of Justice Harry Blackmun’s opinion in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:14 pm by Kiran Bhat
The editorial board of The New York Times criticizes California’s inability to comply with an order (upheld by the Court in its 2011 ruling in Brown v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 8:54 am by Vik Amar
” That sounds a lot like acceptance of Justice Powell’s approach in Regents of the University of California v. [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
California: As most experienced trade secret / noncompete lawyers know, California has a strong public policy against noncompetes (and nonsolicitation agreements, etc.), with few exceptions. [read post]