Search for: "Courts v. Campbell"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 2,915
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2007, 2:13 am
StateCitation: 2007 WY 45Docket Number: 06-37Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, the Honorable John Perry, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Defendant): Kenneth M. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 6:23 am
To begin with, he notes that "[t]he availability of fair use for sexually-themed works has had a mixed reception in the courts," describing a number of cases - including DC Comics Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2007, 7:12 pm
Dougherty, where the Court of Appeal held that a $26 million punitive damage award violated the due process requirements of Campbell v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 9:07 pm
Since joining the academy, Alfred has written regularly in the area of copyright law and served as counsel of record/lead author for an amicus brief to the United States Supreme Court on behalf of 12 copyright scholars in the case of Campbell v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 10:37 am
Oman, "United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 11:03 am
Some of my disagreement with this opinion is founded upon a displeasure with the Supreme Court's opinion about punitive damages in Campbell. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 1:59 am
StateCitation: 2007 WY 33Docket Number: 05-209, 05-210Appeal from the District Court of Campbell County, the Honorable Dan R. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 6:02 am
Campbell, 538 U.S. 408, 416-417 (2003). [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 1:24 pm
And several weeks ago, the Court rejected the petition in Campbell and Pinks v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 1:23 pm
Philip Morris v. [read post]
23 Feb 2007, 5:12 am
Philip Morris v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 9:47 pm
Campbell (2003), and properly allowed the jury to consider nonparty harm only in assessing reprehensibility. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 10:06 am
Patrick Yeatts, a 37-year-old Lynchburg attorney, to serve as judge in Campbell County's General District Court. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 2:58 am
The Court reviewed the district court decision letter and noted their reliance on Franks v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 12:49 pm
That jurisprudence is now quite substantial: TXO Production v. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 11:48 am
It goes something like this: * Jury verdict for $800,000 in compensatory damages and $79.5M in punitive damages; * Punitive damages reduced by trial court to $32M; * Punitive damage award reinstated by Oregon Court of Appeals; * Affirmed by Oregon Supreme Court; * Remanded by US Supreme Court to decide punitive damages issue in light of its new ruling in State Farm v Campbell; * Affirmed again by Oregon Court of… [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 5:05 am
Campbell, 538 U. [read post]
20 Feb 2007, 2:53 am
It goes something like this:Jury verdict for $800,000 in compensatory damages and $79.5M in punitive damages;Punitive damages reduced by trial court to $32M;Punitive damage award reinstated by Oregon Court of Appeals;Affirmed by Oregon Supreme Court;Remanded by US Supreme Court to decide punitive damages issue in light of its new ruling in State Farm v Campbell;Affirmed again by Oregon Court of Appeals;Affirmed again by Oregon Supreme… [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 12:25 am
Campbell, 500 P.2d 21, 33-34 (Kan. 1972); City & County of San Francisco v. [read post]
5 Feb 2007, 7:43 am
February 5, 2007Re: The Preternaturally Prolific Posner on Plagiarism.From: Dean Lawrence R. [read post]
