Search for: "Doe v. Delaware" Results 2861 - 2880 of 3,878
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Nov 2010, 11:40 am by Usha Rodrigues
  When the opinion came out Gordon made the link to Dodge v. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 6:35 am by Broc Romanek
And that makes me have to consider whether there's a reasonable probability of success on the merits for the plaintiffs, which is essentially what will -- what does the record show about what I would likely find as to the merits after trial. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 12:53 am by Kelly
Sybase, Inc. et al (271 Patent Blog) (Docket Report) District Court Delaware : Judgment of nonobviousness does not collaterally estop later assertion of anticipation defense involving the same patents and prior art: Power Integrations Inc. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 4:15 am by Broc Romanek
" In this order, the US District Court for the Middle District of Georgia found that - in AFLAC v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 9:18 pm by Mandelman
  Okay, that was sarcastic, but come on… how ridiculous does this crap have to get before someone says that’s enough? [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 3:09 pm
Cancer Research sued Barr for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware on July 20, 2007. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:00 am by Steve McConnell
We've already posted a couple of times about the Thorogood v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 8:01 pm
Subscribers pay either a $35 annual fee or a $100 one-time lifetime membership fee to the owner of YOL, the Shminden Corporation, a publicly traded company that is incorporated in Delaware and has its principal U.S. place of business in California. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
"Notice -- she says "people" have gotten over their anger, she thinks: she does not include her own feelings about the matter. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 3:08 am
Challenging a disciplinary determination based on allegations that it was not based on "substantial evidence" Spry v Delaware Co., 253 AD2d 178 One of the most common of reasons set out in an appeal challenging an adverse Section 75 disciplinary determination is that the decision is not supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 8:43 pm by cdw
Coons’ testimony does not qualify.. . . [read post]