Search for: "English v. English"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 9,841
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
As to Plaintiff's contention that the establishment of positions of Correction Sergeant (Spanish Language) violated Article V, §6 of Constitution, the court noted that two eligible lists were established, one for Correction Sergeant and a separate list Correction Sergeant (Spanish Language). [read post]
1 Apr 2021, 4:00 am
As to Plaintiff's contention that the establishment of positions of Correction Sergeant (Spanish Language) violated Article V, §6 of Constitution, the court noted that two eligible lists were established, one for Correction Sergeant and a separate list Correction Sergeant (Spanish Language). [read post]
27 May 2011, 6:40 am
This should not be taken as an attack on the approach the English courts have taken in the recent reported cases. [read post]
10 Jun 2012, 10:17 pm
Mortgage Bankers Association v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 11:02 pm
Trenkler v. [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm
” The Judge analysed the assertions made in her letter and concluded that Ms Romanova;s language difficulties did not comprise a significant obstacle, noting that she was an educated woman who was a Professor of Journalism and had “positively asserted an ability to read and write the English language” and, in her own witness statement (in support of her application to set aside service) “indicated a relatively high level of skill in English”. [read post]
29 May 2007, 11:45 am
He learned English and is active in his church and in his community. [read post]
20 Jul 2016, 3:09 am
In an appeal to the JCPC that involves an issue of English law on which a previous decision of the House of Lords, Supreme Court or Court of Appeal is challenged, the members of the JCPC can, if they think it appropriate, not only decide that the previous decision was wrong, but also can expressly direct that domestic courts should treat their decision as representing the law of England and Wales. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 4:50 pm
Lyle reported on the decision for this blog, and Amy Howe covered the decision for us in Plain English. [read post]
29 Apr 2025, 10:57 pm
The question of warranties under English law was addressed in the judgment of Lonham Group Ltd v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 2:05 am
In Watson v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 12:43 pm
In Darweesh v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 7:47 am
V. planifolia. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 9:54 am
Dept. of Agriculture and Consumer Servs. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 9:31 pm
LEXIS 13, RICHARD JOHN WELSH, Petitioner v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 11:00 am
., Arizonans for Official English v. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 6:50 am
It certainly offends Article 6 ECHR, and the Convention has been regarded as part of the English and a European ordre public (Loizidou v Turkey (Article 50), para 48; In re J [2005] UKHL 40, [2006] 1 AC 80, para 44); the Convention is also, in any event, based also on age-old rules of English law (cf. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 2:15 am
Its claim (authorised by the Charity Commission) was based upon seeking court approval for the making of a grant of US$360m to another English charity, Big Win Philanthropy (“BWP”). [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 4:43 pm
Our founding Fathers were very sensitive to the abuses of government power from English courts. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 4:22 pm
According to the People v. [read post]
