Search for: "F v. F"
Results 2861 - 2880
of 57,892
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2023, 9:01 pm
In United States v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 1:54 pm
§ 7443(f). [read post]
8 May 2023, 9:00 am
Highmark Inc. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 7:10 am
Ltd. v. [read post]
8 May 2023, 12:28 am
Medicare Exclusion Risks: Employing Excluded Individuals Can Result in Significant Administrative, Civil and / or Criminal Liabilities (May 8, 2023): One of the most severe administrative sanctions available under the Social Security Act stems from the authority of the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)[1] to “exclude” individuals and entities from participating in Federal health care programs.[2] While the… [read post]
7 May 2023, 5:39 pm
Maril, From Liberation To (Re)Criminalization: Dobbs v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 10:05 am
THE FACTS On 26 January 2015, an F-16D Fighting Falcon jet fighter of the Hellenic Air Force crashed into the flight line at Los Llanos Air Base in Albacete, Spain, killing 11 people: the two crew members and nine on the ground. [read post]
7 May 2023, 7:42 am
This case involves a book called “The Truth About COVID-19: Exposing the Great Reset, Lockdowns, Vaccine Passports, and the New Normal,” which includes a foreword from Robert F. [read post]
7 May 2023, 4:00 am
L’application de la Loi sur la sécurité privée à l’intimée ne cause pas de véritable entrave. [read post]
7 May 2023, 12:30 am
Russell Sandberg, Journal of Law and Society: Marking the 100th Anniversary of the Birth of S F C Milsom (1923-2016): on the value of studying legal history. [read post]
6 May 2023, 6:54 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 9:32 am
Bratton, 376 F Supp 3d 232, 279 [SDNY 2019] ["[E]ntrenched in Supreme Court case law is the principle that the First Amendment's protections for free speech include a constitutionally protected right to gather news"]; Higginbotham v. [read post]
5 May 2023, 6:23 am
Schindler v Isller & Schrage, P.C., 262 AD2d 226 [1st Dept 1999], lv dismissed 94 NY2d 791 [1999] [plaintiff granted judgment on Judiciary Law § 487 claim as defendant law firm knowingly withheld crucial information from court in underlying action]; cf Betz v Blatt, 160 AD3d 696 [2d Dept 2018] [defendant attorney was properly denied summary dismissal of Judiciary Law § 487 claim based on allegations that he filed blatantly deficient accounting with court, which… [read post]
4 May 2023, 9:05 pm
It is a common refrain, mostly on the political right, that considering environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) factors when investing is probably illegal.[1] The basis for this argument derives from the fiduciary duty of loyalty and its corollary, the “sole interest” or “exclusive benefit” rule, enshrined in both federal and state law, which prohibits fiduciaries from investing for any purpose other than the financial well-being of the beneficiary. [read post]
4 May 2023, 1:57 pm
So if Elizabeth Warren wants to write a letter to Amazon asking it not to promote a conspiracy book by Robert F. [read post]
4 May 2023, 12:59 pm
Rogers v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 10:25 am
That doctrine, which flows from McCulloch v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:48 am
In this regard, patent litigators Müller and Müller-Stoy criticize that “[i]f only one patent per family is reviewed for essentiality as planned, the register will not provide any transparency”, and “[s]imilar problems apply with respect to different patent claims in the same patent. [read post]
4 May 2023, 3:58 am
Smart Study Co. v. [read post]
4 May 2023, 2:30 am
., v. [read post]
