Search for: "HOPE v. STATE" Results 2861 - 2880 of 16,493
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2018, 4:27 am by Edith Roberts
” At the National Conference of State Legislatures Blog, Lisa Soronen discusses Mount Lemmon Fire District v. [read post]
7 Mar 2024, 6:08 am by Samuel Bray
And there are other pressures toward abstraction that apply in other cases, such as state standing after Massachusetts v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
The Justices by a 5-4 margin stayed the lower court order from Wisconsin, which hints, at least, that Justice Anthony Kennedy might not be persuaded by the advocates hoping to get him to open wide the door he left ajar in his 2004 concurrence in Vieth v. [read post]
3 May 2019, 3:42 am by Edith Roberts
United States, “an appeal from a convicted sex offender that conservatives are hoping will help rein in the executive branch,” the only undecided case from the October argument session. [read post]
19 Sep 2007, 11:48 am
What if, like some states, they don't adopt the doctrine? [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 10:25 am
Washington Defense of Marriage Alliance: What we are about The Washington Defense of Marriage Alliance seeks to defend equal marriage in this state by challenging the Washington Supreme Court's ruling on Andersen v. [read post]
12 May 2019, 2:15 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
To illustrate, Justice Myers in Jarvis v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 10:50 am by JB
It does not help same sex married couples in any other jurisdiction; they will have to initiate their own litigation in federal district court to overturn section 3 of DOMA, hope they also win, and hope that the government also decides not to appeal. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 4:32 am by Edith Roberts
Mark Walsh has a “view” from the courtroom of yesterday’s oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:16 am
  There’s still hope, though, as the Supreme Court has asked the Solicitor General for his views of the certiorari petition in Stengel. [read post]
9 Feb 2016, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
 It is to be hoped that it will mark the end of routine and unjustified judicial interference with legitimate note taking by members of the public. [read post]