Search for: "High v State" Results 2861 - 2880 of 35,517
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2013, 5:46 am by Deborah Hammonds
  There are several provocative employment law issues awaiting the High Court during the 2013-2014 term, including the first case scheduled for oral arguments, Madigan v Levin (Dkt No 12-872), in which the Court will determine whether state and local government employees may avoid the ADEA and bring age discrimination claims directly under the Equal Protection Clause and Section 1983. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 5:59 am
 In a decision widely considered the high-water mark of state-action doctrine, Shelley v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:57 am by Sean Wajert
On remand, it will be interesting to see what the state court does, given their recent approach of ignoring guidance from the high Court. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 4:36 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Rudewicz, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Justice [2012] EWCA Civ 499 (24 April 2012) Godfrey, R (on the application of) v Southwark [2012] EWCA Civ 500 (24 April 2012) Westlb AG v Nomura Bank International Plc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 495 (24 April 2012) Lalli v Spirita Housing Ltd [2012] EWCA Civ 497 (24 April 2012) Greenwich Community Law Centre, R (on the application of) v Greenwich… [read post]
21 May 2021, 9:12 am by Joe Mullin
Washington State Attorney General Press Release State of Washington v. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Assault on board ships upon the high seas with intent to do bodily harm. 8. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 4:30 am by Matrix Law
This regime was designed to grant leave to remain to high-net-worth individuals making a substantial financial contribution to the UK. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 1:47 pm
They argued that the law required the man to do something more, such as travel to an agreed rendezvous location.Ruling in the case of Commonwealth v. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:21 pm by Jon Sands
Belleque, No. 10-35574 (10-28-11) (Gould with Fisher and Paez).The 9th in habeas holds that the state proved attempted aggravated murder by sufficient evidence.U.S. v. [read post]