Search for: "I v. B" Results 2861 - 2880 of 24,529
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment' for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
26 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"The Appellate Division then noted that the Court of Appeals in its decision in Palmer v Merges, 37 NY2d 177, observed that the rule authorizing a second probationary term, "if properly executed, is largely beneficial to the employee" and "[i]n determining whether another probationary term is necessary as the only alternative to dismissal, the administrator should be given latitude in defining a different assignment for purposes of fresh evaluation. [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 9:44 am by Dennis Crouch
Click-To-Call Technologies, LP,  No. 18-916 (appellate jurisdiction over challenge to PTO’s finding of no time-bar under §315(b)). [read post]
27 Nov 2015, 10:46 am
I would not attach weight to the fact that, on the judge’s construction, feature C(ii)(b) did not itself add anything of substance to claim 2. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
In this edition, I think the most interesting case (of a number of interesting cases) is United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
In a footnote, the judge says that “[b]y `CSE,’ Ms. [read post]